Author: support

Viktoriia V. Dashkova
Candidate of Philological Sciences,
Lecturer of Department of Slavic Linguistics
State institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after
K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odessa, Ukraine
e-mail: Dashkova.VV@pdpu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: https://оrcid.org/ 0000-0002-5759-5987

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2026-42.5

SUMMARY

The proposed article presents a comprehensive linguistic analysis of structural and semantic transformations of the phraseological fund in contemporary prose works by prominent Ukrainian women writers. The research focuses on identifying mechanisms by which established linguistic units acquire new contextual meanings under the influence of individual authorial vision. The work systematizes in detail the most common types of modifications used in contemporary female artistic discourse. In particular, the specifics of the use of component inversion, lexical expansion of the structure of idioms, elliptical reduction, as well as complete or partial deformation of the lexical composition of phraseology are revealed. A special emphasis is placed on the research and study of complex combined transformations that combine several levels of change simultaneously. It is determined that the author's update of phraseology is due to the desire of writers to deautomatize reader perception and enhance the pragmatic impact of works. Modified constructions in modern women's prose perform a number of key functions: from creating a specific stylistic coloring to deeply revealing the psychological subtext of the narrative. It is proven that through rethinking traditional language formulas, authors adapt phraseology to current socio-cultural conditions, giving their works a special emotional richness and intellectual fullness. It is established that transformational processes in the field of phraseology are not only a stylistic technique, but also a powerful tool of selfexpression, allowing to form a unique linguistic picture of the world. The authors prove that it is through the creative processing of idioms that the individualization of artistic speech occurs, which makes women's prose an expressive phenomenon of modern Ukrainian literature.

Key words: phraseological unit, structural-semantic transformation, women's prose, artistic discourse, inversion, author's style, expressivization.

REFERENCES

Badiul V. V. (2019). Kontekstna aktualnist zaminy komponentiv frazeolohichnykh odynyts v ukrainskii zhinochii prozi pochatku XXI stolittia [Contextual relevance of replacing components of phraseological units in Ukrainian women's prose of the early 21st century]. Naukovi pratsi Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka. Filolohichni nauky [Scientific works of the Ivan Ohienko Kamianets-Podilskyi National University: Philological Sciences]. (50), pp. 5–9.
Badiul V. V. (2020). Funktsiino-semantychnyi potentsial frazeolohichnykh odynyts v ukrainskii zhinochii prozi pochatku XXI stolittia: linhvokulturolohichnyi aspekt [Functional-semantic potential of phraseological units in Ukrainian women's prose of the early 21st century: Linguoculturological aspect]: Doctoral dissertation, Odessa.
Bilonozhenko V. M., Hnatiuk I. S. (1989). Funktsionuvannia ta leksykohrafichna rozrobka ukrainskykh frazeolohizmiv [Functioning and lexicographical development of Ukrainian phraseologisms]. Kyiv : Naukova Dumka.
Frazeolohichnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy (1999). [Phraseological dictionary of the Ukrainian language] / Ed. V. M. Bilonozhenko. Kyiv : Naukova Dumka. Hryhorash A. M. (1991). Frazeolohiia i kontekst [Phraseology and context]. Kyiv : Vyshcha Shkola.
Humeniuk N. (2018). Kvity na snihu [Flowers on the snow] (Novel). Kharkiv : Knyzhkovyi Klub “Klub Simeinoho Dozvillia”.

Kondratenko N. V. (2015). Dyskursyvna paradyhma doslidzhen khudozhnoho tekstu [Discursive paradigm of literary text research]. Zapysky romano-hermanskoi filolohii [Notes on Romance-Germanic Philology]. (1), pp. 60–65.
Kononenko Ye. (2010). Knyharnia “Shok”: Novely, esei [Bookstore “Shock”: Novellas, essays] (2nd ed.). Lviv : Kalvariia.
Kononenko Ye. (2016). Nostalihiia [Nostalgia] (Novella). Lviv : Kalvariia.
Kornii D. (2012). Tomu, shcho ty ye [Because you exist] (Novel). Kharkiv : Knyzhkovyi Klub “Klub Simeinoho Dozvillia”.
Kornii D. (2016). Zirka dlia tebe [A star for you] (Novel, 3rd ed.). Kharkiv : Knyzhkovyi Klub “Klub Simeinoho Dozvillia”.
Kostenko H. (2017). Tsurky-hilky. Dzhazovi improvizatsii. Opovidannia [Churky-hilky. Jazz improvisations. Short stories]. Kyiv : Samit-Knyha.
Kostenko L. (2011). Zapysky ukrainskoho samashedshoho [Notes of a Ukrainian madman] (Novel). Kyiv : A-BA-BA-HA-LA-MA-HA.
Matios M. (2013). Cherevychky Bozhọi Materi [The shoes of the Mother of God] (Novella).Lviv : LA “Pyramida”.
Pradid Yu. F. (1996). Frazeolohichni zasoby vyrazhennia emotsiinoho stanu strakhu [Phraseological means of expressing the emotional state of fear]. Kultura slova [Culture of words]. Vol. 48–49, pp. 135–141.
Rozdobudko I. (2008). Dvi khvylyny pravdy [Two minutes of truth] (Novel). Kyiv : Nora-Druk].
Talan S. (2016). Kupelia [The font] (Short story collection). Kharkiv : Knyzhkovyi Klub “Klub Simeinoho Dozvillia”.
Uzhchenko V. D. (2006). Novi linhvystychni paradyhmy “kontsept – frazeolohizm - movna kartyna svitu” [New linguistic paradigms “concept – phraseologism – linguistic picture of the world”]. Skhidnoslovianski movy v ikh istorychnomu rozvytku [East Slavonic Languages in Their Historical Development]. Zaporizhzhia, pp. 146–151.
Uzhchenko V. D., Uzhchenko D. V. (2007). Frazeolohiia suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy [Phraseology of the modern Ukrainian language]. Kyiv : Znannia.
Vdovychenko H. (2008). Pivabluka [Half of an apple] (Novel). Kyiv : Nora-Druk.

Olga O. Bychkova
Postgraduate student of the first year of study
specialty 035 “Philology”
State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical
University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odessa, Ukraine
e-mail: olha.bychkova@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7590-4721

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2026-42.4

SUMMARY

The relevance of the study is driven by the transformational processes in the field of professional communication within law enforcement agencies and the need for proper linguo-pragmatic, regulatory, and socio-cultural conceptualization of police discourse in the context of globalization. Despite the existence of individual linguistic studies, a number of issues related to the verbal implementation of power, conflict de-escalation strategies, terminological unification, and ethical standards of police communication with citizens in English, German, and Ukrainianspeaking environments require additional scientific analysis from a comparative linguistic perspective. The aim of the article is to investigate the structural, semantic, pragmatic, and legal features of police discourse in Ukraine and selected foreign countries (the UK, the USA, and Germany) to formulate grounded proposals for improving the professional training and speech culture of national police personnel. The study employs formal-legal, comparativetypological, discourse-analytical, logical-semantic methods, and the method of contextual interpretation. As a result of the study, it was established that the linguo-legal basis of police discourse in Ukraine is formed by the provisions of specialized legislation and departmental regulations, which define speech etiquette and communication algorithms during the performance of official duties. It was revealed that the Ukrainian model is characterized by a transition from imperative-directive to service-oriented speech strategies, which leads to changes in the lexical content of the discourse and the emergence of new communicative clichés. It was proven that the pragmatic basis of police discourse in the English language relies significantly on precedent speech acts and standardized warning formulas, which enhances the legal significance of verbal interaction. It was found that German police discourse is distinguished by a high degree of nominalization and terminological precision, ensuring objectivity in recording offenses in procedural documentation. Comparative analysis showed that in Anglo-American and German traditions, police discourse is combined with well-developed mechanisms of linguistic expertise of law enforcement speech, transparency of communicative scenarios, and a clear distinction between official and operational speech styles. It was substantiated that Ukrainian police discourse generally develops in line with Western democratic standards (“Community Policing”), yet requires further lexicographic processing and harmonization with international standards of professional communication. The practical value of the work lies in clarifying the linguopragmatic nature of police discourse, identifying its key cognitivediscursive characteristics, and determining elements of foreign linguistic experience that are significant for increasing the efficiency of law enforcement activities, ensuring human rights during communication, and forming a positive image of the police in Ukrainian society.

Key words: police discourse, professional communication, linguopragmatics, legal linguistics, comparative linguistic analysis, speech strategies, police speech culture.

REFERENCES

Alobaidallah A., Almutairi M. Linguistic pragmatics of police-citizen interaction: a comparative study (2025). International Journal of Law and Language. Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 108–124.
Bundeskriminalamt (2024). Standardisierte Berichterstattung und polizeiliche Fachsprache. Wiesbaden.
Bytyak O. V. (2023). Linhvopravovi zasady profesiynoyi komunikatsiyi u pravookhoronniy diyalnosti. [Linguo-Legal Principles of Professional Communication in Law Enforcement Activities]. Monograph. Kharkiv : Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (1984). Law of Ukraine of 07.12.1984 No. 8073-X. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10 [in Ukrainian].
College of Policing (2025). Authorised Professional Practice: Communication and Engagement. Coventry.
Delbosc A., Richardson J. (2025). Communicative strategies in Community Policing: global trends. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Vol. 108, pp. 25–40.

Home Office (2025). Manual of Guidance for Police Communications and Speech Standards 2025. London : HMSO.
Ivanovska T., Petrenko L. (2025). Privacy-by-design in digital police monitoring systems. European Journal of Privacy Law. № 1, pp. 70–82.
Kryvoblotskyy V. V. (2025). Yurydychna linhvistyka: porivnyalnyy analiz pravovykh terminosystem. [Legal Linguistics: Comparative Analysis of Legal Terminology]. Tsyfrova transformatsiya prava. [ Digital transformation of law’]. 2, pp. 138–150 [in Ukrainian].
New York City Department of Transportation (2024). Automated Speed Enforcement Program Report 2024. New York.
Privacy Commissioner of New Zealand (2024). Privacy Impact Assessment: Safety Cameras Program. Wellington.
Pro zatverdzhennya Pravyl etychnoyi povedinky politseyskykh (2016). Nakaz MVS Ukrayiny vid 09.11.2016 No. 1179. [On approval of the Rules of ethical conduct of police officers: order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine dated 09.11.2016 No. 1179]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1576-16 [in Ukrainian].
Svitlychnyi O. P. (2024). Movlennyeva kultura politseyskoho yak instrument zabezpechennya prav lyudyny. [Speech Culture of the Policeman as a Tool for Ensuring Human Rights.] Pravo i suspilstvo [ Law and Society]. 3, pp. 80–95 [in Ukrainian].
Vadeby A., Howard M. (2024). Terminology and precision in German police reports: a linguistic evaluation. Legal Linguistics Review. Vol. 195, pp. 208–220.
Zvit pro vprovadzhennya standartiv (2026) profesiynoyi komunikatsiyi v orhanakh Natsionalnoyi politsiyi Ukrayiny za 2025 rik. [Report on the Implementation of Professional Communication Standards in the National Police of Ukraine for 2025]. Kyiv: NPU.

Evelina V. Boieva
Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor,
Associate Professor at the Department of Ukrainian and Foreign Literature
State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical
University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odessa, Ukraine
e-mail: evelinaboeva4@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5966-0538

Viktoriia O. Bieliaievska
Bachelor’s Degree Student (First Cycle of Higher Education),
4th-year student, Faculty of Foreign Languages
State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical
University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odessa, Ukraine
e-mail: rachelroth1812@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5659-790X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2026-42.3

SUMMARY

The article presents a contrastive analysis of the features of syntactic relations as realized in Ukrainian literary texts and their translations. The research material comprises Ukrainian literary works of the nineteenth century belonging to different genres, namely P. Kulish’s novel «The Black Council» and T. Shevchenko’s poems «Haidamaky» and «Hamalija», as well as their English translations. The relevance of the study is determined by the need for an in-depth examination of the syntactic organization of literary texts in connection with issues of interlingual interpretation and translation equivalence. Moreover, scholars have not previously addressed a contrastive analysis of the syntactic structure of historical literary works and their English translation interpretations. The main focus is placed on the analysis of types of syntactic relations (coordination, subordination, and asyndetic connection), the specificity of their formal-grammatical and semantic-pragmatic expression, as well as the role of syntactic constructions in creating imagery and expressiveness in literary discourse. The study establishes that Ukrainian literary discourse is characterized by variability of syntactic structures, active use of asyndetic connection, inversion, parcellation, and rhythmized constructions, which is обусловлено by the traditions of national poetics and the folkloric foundation of the texts. In contrast, English translations of Ukrainian literary texts demonstrate a tendency toward greater syntactic orderliness, explicit expression of logical-semantic relations, and a predominance of subordinate constructions. Considerable attention is paid to translation transformations, in particular grammatical substitution, sentence segmentation, and sentence integration, which are employed to preserve the stylistic dominant and pragmatic potential of the source text. The contrastive analysis proves that differences in the realization of syntactic relations are conditioned by the typological features of the languages, the cultural-historical context, and the specificity of artistic thinking.

Key words: syntactic relations, complex sentence, literary discourse, contrastive analysis, coordination, subordination, asyndetic connection.

REFERENCES

Zagnitko A. (2009). Ukrainskyi syntaksys: teoretyko-prykladnyi aspekt [Ukrainian syntax: theoretical and applied aspect]. Donetsk, 137 p. Available at: https://www.ukrajinistika.edu.rs/preuzimanje/UKR_sintaksis.pdf
Kulish P. (2019). Chorna rada [The Black Council]. Osvita.UA. Available at: https://osvita.ua/doc/files/news/639/63980/Kulish_Panteleimon_Chorna_rada.pdf
Lukianchenko I., Boeva E. (2025). Porivnialna typolohiia anhliiskoi ta ukrainskoi mov z praktykumom [Comparative typology of English and Ukrainian languages with a workshop]. Odesa, 286 p. Available at: http://dspace.pdpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/22469/3/Lukyanchenko.pdf
Chaikovska N. (2019). Strukturno-stylistychni osoblyvosti syntaksysu romaniv Iena Makiuena (na osnovi romaniv «Na berezi» ta «Spokuta») [Structural and stylistic features of the syntax of Ian McEwan's novels (based on the novels «On Chesil Beach» and «Atonement»)]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Filolohiia [ International Humanitarian University Bulletin. Philology], vol. 3, no. 43, pp. 110–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2019.43.3.26
Shevchenko T. (2018). Haidamaky [Haidamaki]. Osvita.UA. Available at: https://osvita.ua/school/literature/sh/63738/
Shevchenko T. (2020). Hamaliia [Hamaliya]. Osvita.UA. Available at: https://osvita.ua/school/literature/sh/78490/
Kulish P. (1973). The Black Council. Ukrainian Studies at the University of Toronto. Available at: https://tarnawsky.artsci.utoronto.ca/elul/English/218/BlackCouncil.pdf
Shevchenko T. (2015). «Haidamaki» poem (English translation by John Weir). Available at: https://taras-shevchenko.storinka.org/taras-shevchenko-poemhaidamaki-english-translation-by-john-weir.html
Shevchenko T. (2015) «Hamaliya» poem (English translation by John Weir). Available at: https://taras-shevchenko.storinka.org/taras-shevchenko-hamaliyapoem-english-translation-by-john-weir.html

Natalia G. Arefieva
Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor at the Chair of Social Sciences
Odessa National Medical University,
Odessa, Ukraine
e-mail: n.arefieva@onu.edu.ua; nataliia.arefieva@onmedu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4974-9157

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2026-42.2

SUMMARY

The article, drawing on a wealth of linguistic material, explores Slavic phraseological units that reflect the symbolics of kalach. The powerful cultural symbolics of kalach as an archaic cultural symbol, clearly represented in Slavic phraseology, is described. The author concludes that the sacred symbolics of kalach, fixed mainly by regional phraseology, its protective and productive functions, and its exceptionally important role in baptismal and wedding rituals, has a deep mythodological basis and is assosiated with the cult of the sun – an ancient sacred symbol, a source of life-given force, sublimity and happiness, the round shape of wich is encoded in such symbols established in folk culture as the kalach, korovay, vinok, wedding ring and others. That is why in Slavic phraseology, the kalach appears as a symbol of abundance, well-being and good fortune. The functional role of kalach, its ontological properties are understood in Slavic phraseology within the framework of semiotic oppositions and highlight various aspects of the human personality, life experience, etc. Kalach appears in the center of a number of prescriptions established in culture. The vivid and multifaceted representation of kalach in Slavic phraseology, primarily Russian, Ukrainian and Bulgarian, indicates the exceptional cultural load of this term, placing it in the category of powerful cultural symbols. In the process of research, a rich phraseological material was involved, the methodology of ethnolinguistic and cultural analysis, semiotic analysis, the method of structural and semantic modeling and the substitution technique were applied.

Key words: Slavic phraseology, cultural symbol, mythological background, semiotic opposition, cultural prescription, conceptual metaphor, Slavic cultural tradition.

REFERENCES

Arefieva N. G. (2018). Rosiisko-ukrainskyi frazeolohichnyi slovnyk kulturnykh symvoliv [Russian and Ukrainian Phraseological Dictionary of Cultural Symbols]. Odessa : ONU imeni I. I. Mechnykova.
Arefieva N. G. (2021). Frazeolohiia rosiiskykh pereselenskykh hovirok Pivdnia Ukrainy: linhvokulturolohichnyi ta leksykohrafichnyi aspekty [Phraseology of Russian Migrant Dialects of the South of Ukraine: Linguocultural and Lexicographic aspects] : dys. … d-ra filol. nauk : 10.02.02. Dnipro [in Ukrainian].
Arefieva N. G. (2023). Prostorovyi linhvokulturnyi kod u rosiiskykh hovirkakh Odeshchyny (na materiali frazeolohii) [Spatial linguocultural code in Russian dialects of Odessa region]. Akademyk Oleksandr Savych Melnychuk i suchasne movoznavstvo. II [Academician Aleksandr Savich Melnichuk and contemporary linguistics]. Kyiv : Vydavnychyi dim Dmytra Buraho, pp. 217–235 [in Ukrainian].
Arefieva N. G. (2024). Frazeolohiia v katehoriiakh kultury [Phraseology in the categories of culture]. Naukovyi visnyk PNPU im. K. D. Ushynskoho. Linhvistychni nauky [Scientific research issues of South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University. Linguistic sciences]. Issue 39, pp. 76–89.
Arefieva N. G. (2025a). Doshch pry sontsi v slovianskii frazeolohii [Rain in the sun in Slavic phraseology]. Naukovyi visnyk PNPU im. K. D. Ushynskoho. Linhvistychni nauky [Scientific Research Issues of South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University. Linguistic sciences]. Issue 40, pp. 31–46 [in Ukrainian].
Arefieva N. G. (2025b). Etyketni formuly v narodnii frazeolohii (na materiali rosiiskykh pereselenskykh hovirok Odeshchyny) [Etiquette formulas in folk phraseology]. Naukovyi visnyk PNPU im. K. D. Ushynskoho. Linhvistychni nauky [Scientific research issues of South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University. Linguistic sciences]. Issue 41, pp. 15–33 [in Ukrainian].
Arefieva N. G. (2025v). Sontse v dzerkali bolharskoi frazeolohii [Sun in the mirror of Bulgarian phraseology]. Mova [Linguistics]. Issue 43, pp. 67–75 [in Ukrainian].
Arikova N. I. (2023). Astronomichnyi linhvokulturnyi kod u rumunskii frazeolohii [Astronomical linguocultural code in Romanian phraseology]. Filologichni studii : zbirnyk naukovykh statei studentiv filolohichnoho fakultetu [Philological Studies : the Students of the Philological Faculty Scientific Research Issues Collection]. Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Philological Faculty. Odessa. Issue XIV, pp. 8–12 [in Ukrainian].
BRR (1966). Bъlharsko-rusky rechnyk (1966) [Bulgarian-Russian Language] / [comp. S. B. Bernshtein].
ESUM (1985). Etymolohichnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: u 7 t. [Etymological Dictionary of Ukrainian Language]. Kyiv : Naukova dumka. T. 2: D– Koptsi [in Ukrainian].
FRBE (1974–1975). Frazeologichen rechnik na bъlgarskiya yezik [Phraseological Dictionary of Bulgarian Languge]. Sofia : BAN. T. 1–2 [in Bulgarian].
FSRGO (2020). Arefieva N. G. (2020). Frazeologіchnii slovnik rosіiskikh govіrok Odeshchini [Phraseological Dictionary of Russian dialects of Odessa region]. Odessa : Odeskii natsіonalnii unіversitet іmenі І. І. Mechnikova.
FSSSHD (2013). Uzhchenko V. D., Uzhchenko D. V. Frazeolohіchnyi slovnyk shіdnoslobozhans’kyh і stepovyh hovіrok Donbasu [Phraseological Dictionary of Eastern Slobozhanshchina and Steppe Dialects of Donbas]. Lugans’k : Lugans’k Taras Shevchenko National University [in Ukrainian].
FSUM (1993). Frazeolohіchnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Phraseological Dictionary of Ukrainian Language [V. M. Bіlonozhenko et al. (comp.)]. Kyiv : Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Georgieva I. (1993). Bъlharska narodna mytolohyia [Bulgarian Folk Mythology]. Sofia : Nauka i izkustvo [in Bulgarian].
Iliadi A. I., Derik I. M. (2023). Mifolohichnyi rakurs movnoi kartyny svitu (misiats i sontse u frazeolohii) [Mythological Perspective of the Linguistic Worldview (the Moon and the Sun in Phraseology)]. Naukovyi visnyk PNPU im. K. D. Ushynskogo. Linhvistychni nauky [Scientific Research Issues of South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky. Linguistic Sciences]. Odessa. Issue 37, pp. 5–17 [in Ukrainian].
Lepeshaў I. Ya. (2008). Sloўnik frazealahizmaў: u 2 t. [Phraseological Dictionary]. Minsk : Belarus. Entsyklapedyia imia P. Broўki. T. 1–2 [in Byelorussian].
NFRBE (1993). Ankova-Nicheva K. Nov frazeologichen rechnik na b'lgarskiya ezik [New Phraseological Dictionary of Bulgarian Languge]. Sofiya : UI «Sv. Kliment Ohridski» [in Bulgarian].
RBSS (2018). Russian-Byelorussian dictionary of comparisons / [T. V. Volodina, V. M. Mokyenko]. Minsk : Belaruskaia navuka.
SFUM (2003). Slovnyk frazeologizmiv ukrains’koi movy [Dictionary of Ukrainian Phraseological Units / [comp. V. M. Bilonozhenko etc.]. Kyiv : Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
SSNP (1993). Slovnik stіikikh narodnikh porіvnyan [Dictionary of stable folk comparisons / [O. S. Yurchenko, A. O. Іvchenko]. Kharkіv : Osnova [in Ukrainian].
UPP (1984). Ukrainski pryslivia ta prykazky [Ukrainian proverbs and sayings] / [C. V. Myshanych, M. M. Paziak]. Kyiv : Dnipro [in Ukrainian].
Uzeneva E. S. (2010). Bolgarskaia svadba: etnolingvisticheskoe issledovanie [Bulgarian Wedding: Ethnolinguistic Study]. Indrik.
Uzhchenko V. D., Uzhchenko D. V. (1998). Frazeolohіchnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Phraseological Dictionary of Ukrainian Language]. Kyiv : Osvita [in Ukrainian].
Yakovlieva O. V. (2014). Obriadovyi dyskurs v systemi natsionalnoi linhvomentalnosti: monohrafiia [Ritual discourse in the system of national linguomentality]. Odessa : Odeskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni I. I. Mechnykova [in Ukrainian].
Skorupka St. (1974–1975). Słownik frazeologiczny języka polskiego: w 2 t. [Phraseological dictionary of Polish language]. Warszawa : Weedza Powszechna. T. 1 [in Polish].
Voitovych V. M. (2005). Ukrainska mifolohiia [Ukrainian mythology]. Kyiv : Lybidʼ [in Ukrainian].
WSPR (1979). Hessen D., Stypuła R. Wielki słownik polsko-rosyjski. Warszawa : Wiedza Powszechna. Т. 1 [in Polish].
Zhaivoronok V. V. (2006). Znaki ukrayinsʼkoi etnokulʼtury [Signs of Ukrainian Ethnoculture]. Kyiv : Dovіra [in Ukrainian].

Alexander I. Iliadi
Doctor of Philological Sciences, Full Professor at the Chair
of Translation, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics
State Institution «South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University
named after K. D. Ushynsky»,
Odessa, Ukraine
e-mail: alexandr.iliadi@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5078-8316

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2026-42.1

SUMMARY

The paper aims to address the phenomenon of the typology of lexical meaning evolution in the Indo-European languages. Particularly, it is about a significant group of semantically monotypic lexemes (nouns and adjectives), which regularly develop the meaning ʻignorantʼ, whereby demonstrating same semantic shift. The criterion of “sameness” implies that not only the secondary sememes ʻignorantʼ, ʻuneducated person’ should be identical in the analyzed sum of synonyms, but also their original meanings ʻrudeʼ, ʻroughʼ, ʻuncouthʼ, ʻunknownʼ, ʻunfamiliarʼ; and such correlation in the pair “original sememe” : “second sememe” must be traceable in all languages, used in the liguistic analysis. Thus, the results of this study testify about typicality of the above mentioned semantic shift, that can be modeled by determining (a) the initial and the final stages of the semantic change; (b) the same vector of the semantic evolution of the synonymous words; (c) diachronic reproducibility of the model of the semantic change in the different periods of the separate languages history.

Key words: semantics, model of the semantic development, caritive, privative, prefix.

REFERENCES

Adams D. Q. (2013). A Dictionary of Tocharian B. Revised and Greatly Enlarged. Amsterdam ; New York, NY : Rodopi.
Bailey H. W. (1979). Dictionary of Khotan Saka. Cambridge ; London etc. : Cambridge University Press.
Beda (1890). The Old English Version of Bedeʼs Ecclesiastical History of the English People [Edited with a translation and introduction by Thomas Miller]. Part II. London : N. Trübner and Co.
Bosworth J. D. D. (1921). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary (Based on the manuscript collections). Oxford : Clarendon press.
Carling G. (2008). A Dictionary and Thesaurus of Tocharian A. Vol. 1: Letters a-j (Manuscript). Wiesbaden : The authors and Otto Harrassowitz.
de V aan M. (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages. Leiden ; Boston : Brill.
Edelman D. I. (2015). Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Languages. Volume 5.
ESSJ (1999). Etymological Dictionary of the Slavonic Languages: Proto-Slavonic Lexical Fund / [edited by acad. O. N. Trubačev]. Nauka. Vol. 25 (*neroditi – *novotьnъ(jь)).
Forcellinus Aegidius (1828). Totius Latinitatis lexicon. Volumen secundum, Londini: Baldwin et Cradock.
Gharib Badr al-Zamān (1995). Sogdian Dictionary: Sogdian-Persian-English, Tehran : Farhangan Publications.
Holthausen F. (1963). Altenglisches etymologisches Wörterbuch [Zweite, bis auf das Literaturverzeichnis unveränderte Auflage]. Heidelberg : Carl Winter.
Kotnik J. (1967). Slovensko-ruski slovar. Ljubljana : Državna založba Slovenije.
MacKenzie David N. (1986). A Concise Pahlavi Dictionary. London ; New York ; Toronto : Oxford University Press.
Mičatek L. A. (1903). Differential Serbian-Russian Dictionary and Brief Grammar of the Serbian Language (comp. P. A. Lavrov).

Rastorgueva V. S. (1966). Middle Persian Language. Science.
Smoczyński W. (2019). Słownik etymologiczny języka litewskiego / [Współpraca redakcyjna M. Osłon, wydanie drugie, poprawione i znacznie rozszerzone, na prawach rękopisu]. Available at: www.rromanes.org/pub/alii/Smoczyński W. Słownik
etymologiczny języka litewskiego.pdf.
Tolstoj I. I. (1957). Srpsko-hrvatsko-ruski rečnik. GIINS.
RSJ (2007). Rečnik srpskoga jezika / [redigovao i uredio Miroslav Nikolić]. Novi Sad : Matica srpska [in Serbian].