Skip to content

Category: Issue #27

Колесніченко А. В. , Жмаєва Н. С.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2018-27-16

Key words: scientific and technical literature, automatic translation, grammatical difficulties.

The article is devoted to the analysis of grammatical difficulties encountered in the process of automatic translation. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the SDL Trados automatic translation service. The types of grammatical errors when translating scientific and technical texts in SDL Trados are classified, the ways of overcoming them are outlined.

REFERENCES

Andriyenko, L. O. (2005) Problemy rozvytku mashinnogo perekladu na suchasnomu etapi // Humanitarniy visnyk. Seriya: Inozemna filolohiya: — Cherkasy: ChDTU, Chislo devyat [In Ukrainian].

Vetuhova, L. M., Zhovtyak, V. D., Plohih, E. V. (2009) Primenenie programm mashinnogo perevoda v informatsionnom obespechenii mezhdunarodnyih kosmicheskih programm // Sbornik materialov XVI Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii “Kryim 2009: Biblioteki i informatsionnyie resursyi v sovremennom mire nauki, kulturyi, obrazovaniya i biznesa”. Kryim, Sudak. [In Russian].

Kulagina, O. S. (1991) O sovremennom sostoyanii mashinnogo perevoda // Matematicheskie voprosy kibernetiki. M.: Nauka [In Russian].

Kartseva, Yu. (2016) Razvitie mashinnogo perevoda i ego mesto v professionalnoy mezhkulturnoy kommunikatsii // Vestnik RUDN, seriya Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika. # 3. [In Russian].

Klimzo, B. N. (2006) Remeslo tehnicheskogo perevodchika. Ob angliyskom yazyike, perevode i perevodchikah nauchno-tehnicheskoy literatury. M.: Valent [In Russian].

Коваленко А. А., Юхимець С. Ю.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2018-27-15

Key words: Chinese poetry ’shi’, realia, translation operations

The article deals with the problem of rendering the Chinese poetry ’shi’ in English and Ukrainian translation. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of translating realia. The translation operations employed to render the semantics and pragmatics of the Chinese belles-lettres literature by means of typologically distant languages have also been analyzed.

REFERENCES

Vereschyagin, E. M. (1983). Yazik i kultura. Lingvostranovedenie v prepodavanii russkogo yazika kak inostrannogo [Language and culture. Linguistic and cultural studies in the teaching of Russian as a foreign language]. M. : Russkiy yazik [in Russian].

Vinogradov, V. S. (2001). Vvedenie v perevodovedenie (obschie i leksicheskie voprosy) [Introduction to translation (common and lexical problems)]. M.: Izdatelstvo instituta obschego srednego obrazovaniya RAO [in Russian].

Vlakhov, S. (1980). Neperevodimoe v perevode [Untranslatable in translation]. M.: Mezhdunarodnie otnosheniya [in Russian].

Kazakova, T. A. (1988). Strategii resheniya zadach v hudozhestvennom prevode [Strategies of solving problems in literary translation]. M. [in Russian].

Serebryakov, E. A. (1979). Kitayskaya poeziya X-XI v. Zhanry shi i ci [Chinese poetry of X-XI centuries. Shi and ci genres.]. L.: Izdatelstvo LGU [in Russian].

Tan Aoshuan (2012). Kitayskaya kartina mira. Yazik, kultura, mentalnost [Chinese worldview. Language, culture, mentality]. M. [in Russian].

Shekera, Ya.V. (2004). Obraz vody v davniy kitayskiy poezii [The water image in ancient Chinese poetry]. Visnyk KNU. Skhidni movy ta literatury [in Ukrainian].

Cai, Zong-qi. How to Read Chinese Poetry: a guided anthology. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008. Print. [In English].

Кисіль В. І., Юхимець С. Ю.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2018-27-14

Key words: business discourse, translation operation, terminology, a term, the Chinese language.

The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of the translation of terminology on the material of the English business discourse into Ukrainian and Chinese. The study represents the main approach to the definitions of such concepts as “business discourse” and “translation operation” in current language- and translational studies; the linguistic features of business discourse are analyzed; the translation operations applied at the lexical-semantic and structural component levels when translating English terms of business discourse into Ukrainian and Chinese are analyzed; the choice of translation operations when translating the terms of English discourse as a method of achieving an adequate translation.

REFERENCES

Bure, N. A. (2003) Osnovy nauchnoy rechi. SPb.:Filologicheskiy fakultet SPbGU; M.: Izdatelskiy tsentr “Akademiya” [In Russian].

Grinev-Grinevich, S. V. (1993) Vvedenie v terminovedenie. M.: Moskov. Litsey [In Russian].

Kunch, Z. (2014) Osoblyvosti diplomatichnoho movlennya yak riznovydu ofitsiyno-dilovoho stylyu // Ukrayinska natsionalna ideya: realiyi ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Vyp. 26. [In Ukrainian].

Nelyubin, L. L. (2018) Nauka o perevode (istoriya i teoriya s drevneyshykh vremen do nashykh dney): uch. Posobie. M.: Flinta [In Russian].

Sdobnikov, V. V., Petrova, O. V. (2001) Teoriya perevoda. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo NGLU im. N. A. Dobrolyubova [In Russian].

Shiryaeva, T. A. (2006) K voprosu o statuse diskursa // Vestnik PGLU [In Russian].

Shlyopkina, M. A. (2011) Delovoy diskurs kak institutsionalnoe yavlenie. Rol klishe v delovom diskurse // Sovremennaya filologiya: materialy mezhdunar. nauch. konf. Ufa: Leto [In Russian].

Bargiela–Chiappini F./Business English from a linguistic perspective / та F. Bargiela–Chiappini, C. Nickerson // English for Specific Purposes World, ISSN 1682–3257, www.esp-world.info, Special Issue #1, Vol. 16, 2015. — 12 р. [In English].

Bovee C. L. Business Communication Today/С. L. Bovee, J. V. Thill//6th edition, Upper Saddle River. — New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2000. — 692 p. [In English].

Cabré M. T. Terminology: Theory, Methods, and Applications (Terminology And Lexicography Research And Practice) / M. T. Cabré. — Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co., 1999. — 260 p. [In English].

Karasik V. I. Language circle, personality, concepts, discourse / V. I. Kar. — Moscow: “Gnosis”, 2004. [In English].

Зосімова О. Ю., Александрова О. В.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2018-27-13

Key words: scientific and technical literature, translation operations, general and specific translation features.

This article presents the research of translation operations used when translating Chinese scientific and technical texts into Ukrainian and English. General and specific language typological features of presented Chinese scientific and technical texts in Ukrainian and English are discussed.

REFERENCES

Alekseeva, I. S. (2008) Tekst i perevod. M.: Mezhdunarodnyie otnosheniya [In Russian].

Borisova, L. I. (2001) Leksicheskie osobennosti anglo-russkogo nauchno-tehnicheskogo perevoda. M.: MPU [In Russian].

Brandes, M. P. (2001) Predperevodcheskiy analiz teksta. M.: NVI-TEZAURUS [In Russian].

Van, Menyao (2014) Sovremennaya nauka o perevode v Kitae: istoriya stanovleniya i tendentsii razvitiya: dissertatsiya. M. [In Russian].

Gorelov, V. I. (1984) Leksikologiya kitayskogo yazyika: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov ped. in-tov po spetsialnosti inostrannyie yazyiki. M.: Prosveschenie [In Russian].

Gorelov, V. I. (1979) Stilistika sovremennogo kitayskogo yazyika.: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov ped. in-tov po spetsialnosti inostrannyie yazyiki. M.: Prosveschenie [In Russian].

Gorelov, V. I. (1989) Teoreticheskaya grammatika kitayskogo yazyika: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov ped. in-tov po spetsialnosti inostrannyie yazyiki. M.: Prosveschenie [In Russian].

Gredina, I. V. (2010) Perevod v nauchno-tehnicheskoy deyatelnosti: uchebnoe posobie. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta [In Russian].

Komissarov, V. N. (2009) Obschaya teoriya perevoda : Problemy perevodovedeniya v osveschenii zarubezhnykh uchyonykh: (Uchebnoe posobie). M.: Knizhnyiy dom “LIBRAKOM” [In Russian].

Kochergin, I. V. (2012) Osnovy nauchno-tehnicheskogo perevoda s kitayskogo yazyka na russkiy. M.: Vostochnaya kniga [In Russian].

Minyar-Beloruchev, R. K. (1996) Teoriya i metody perevoda. M.: Moskovskiy Litsey [In Russian].

Nelyubin, L. L. (2003) Tolkovyy perevodovedcheskiy slovar. M.: Flinta: Nauka [In Russian].

Parshin, A. (2000) Teoriya i praktika perevoda. Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov lingvisticheskih fakultetov VUZov. M.: Russkiy yazyik [In Russian].

Problemi avtomatizovanogo perekladu (2013) T. M. Korolyova, S. Yu. Yukhymets // Naukovyy visnyk PNPU: Lingvistychni nauky, # 17 [In Ukrainian].

Semenas, A. L. (2005) Leksika kitayskogo yazyka. M.: Vostok-Zapad [In Russian].

Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2007) Interpretatsiya nauchnogo teksta: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: LKI [In Russian].

Schichko, V. F. (2010) Kitayskiy yazyk. Teoriya i praktika perevoda. M.: Vostochnaya kniga [In Russian].

Byrne Jody. Technical Translation. Usability Strategies for Translating Technical Documentation / Jody Byrne. — Springer, 2006. — 257 pages. [In English].

He X. B. Explicitation in Chinese translation process. / X. B. He — Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 2003. — № 4. — P. 63–66. [In English].

Pellatt Valerie ThinkingChineseTranslation. A Course in Translation Method: Chinese to English / Valerie Pellatt, Eric T. Liu — London & New York, Routledge, 2010. — 235 с. [In English].

Pellatt Valerie Translating Chinese Culture. The Process of Chinese-English Translation / Pellatt Valerie, Yalta Ya-Yun — London & New York, Routledge, 2014. — 248 с. [In English].

Yú dōng, chénkěpéi. Lùn fānyì cèlüè de wénhuà nèiyīn/ dōng yú, kě péi chén. // Jiěfàngjūn wàiguóyǔ xuéyuàn xuébào. — 2003 Nián. — 312 Yè. [In Chinese].

Zhmayeva N. S., Koroleva T. M., Popova O. V.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2018-27-12

Key words: political discourse, communicative-functional approach, strategy of translation, tactic, operation.

The article deals with the specifics of translating English political discourse into German in the communicative-functional and linguistic perspectives. The results of the paper discover strong correlation between the strategy of translation and the choice of corresponding tactics and operations. Translation techniques are caused by structural linguistic differences within the language pair.

REFERENCES

Prunch, E, (2015) Puti razvitiya zapadnogo perevodovedeniya: ot yazykovoy asimmetrii k politicheskoy. M.: R. Valent [In Russian].

Sdobnikov, V. V. (2015) Kommunikativnaya situatsiya kak osnova vybora strategii perevoda. Moskovskiy gos. lingvist, un-t [In Russian].

Korolyova, T. M., Zhmayeva, N. S. (2018) Strategiyi, taktiky ta operatsiyi perekladu. Proceedings of XX International scientific conference “Practical Applications of Research Findings”. — Morrisville, Lulu Press [In Ukrainian].

Druzhina T. A.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2018-27-11

Key words: folklore discourse, institutional (subcultural) type of discourse.

The article deals with the all-sided study of the folklore discourse in current linguistics. The relevance of the institutional (subcultural) type of discourse distinctive features for folklore discourse is established and the complexity of the folklore discourse description is defined; the processes that characterize the folklore discourse have been revealed.

REFERENCES

Karasik, V. I. (2004) Yazykovoy krug: lichnost, kontsepty, diskurs. M.: GNOZIS [In Russian]

Emer, Yu. A. (2011) Miromodelirovanie v sovremennom pesennom folklore: kognitivno-diskursivnyy analiz. Tomsk [In Russian]

Butler Gary R. Folklore and the Analysis of Folk Discourse: Cultural Connotation and Oral Tradition in Communicative Events / Gary Re Butler // Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics. — Toronto, 1984. — Vol. 5. — P. 32–50.

Druzhyna Т. А. (2016) Folklore Discourse / T. A. Druzhyna // Typologiya suchasnogo dyskursu: Monografiya. K.: Osvita Ukrayiny [In Ukrainian]

Derik I. M.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2018-27-10

Key words: discourse, paradigm, phenomenon, immanent features, typological peculiarities, institutional discourse.

The presented article is aimed at elaborating the problem of translating discourse in the contemporary linguistic paradigm. The main objective of the paper consists in investigating discourse as the speech and mental phenomenon studied in accordance with the communicative and translational aspects. The results of the carried-out research have proved that there exist typological peculiarities for each separate type of institutional discourse. The practical value of the research lies in the fact that the outlined regularities permit to justify the truthfulness of the thesis of the existential nature of discourse.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

Борботько В. Г. Принципы формирования дискурса. От психолингвистики к лингвосинергетике / В. Г. Борботько. — M.: Книжный дом “ЛИБРОКОМ”, 2009. — 288 с.

Дерік І. М. Варіативність перекладів як результат відмінностей у мовних картинах світу / І. М. Дерік// Studia Slawistyczne. Etnolingwistyka i komunikacia miedzykulturowa. — Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin, 2017. — С. 381–391.

Дерік І. М. Типологічні особливості дискурсу Інтернет-повідомлень ділової тематики / І. М. Дерік // Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, III (12), Issue: 60, 2015. — P. 31–35.

Карасик В. И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс / В. И. Карасик. — Волгоград: Перемена. — 2002. — 477 с.

Степанов Ю. С. Альтернативный мир, дискурс, факт и принцип причинности/ Ю. С. Степанов // Язык и наука конца ХХ века. — M.: РАН, 1996. — С. 37–73.

Dijk van T. A. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis / T. A. van Dijk // The sociolinguistic Reader. — 1998. — Vol. 2: Gender and Discourse. — P. 367–393.

REFERENCES

Borbot’ko V. G. Prinicipy formirovanija diskursa: Ot psiholingvistiki k lingvosinergetike/ V. G. Borbot’ko. — M.: Knizhnyj dom “LIBROKOM”, 2009. — 288 p. [in Russian].

Derik I. M. Variatyvnist perekladiv yak rezultat vidminnostei u movnykh kartynakh svitu/ I. M. Derik// Studia Slawistyczne. Etnolingwistyka i komunikacia miedzykulturowa. — Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin, 2017. — P. 381–391. [in Ukrainian].

Derik I. M. Typolohichni osoblyvosti dyskursu Internet-povidomlen dilovoi tematyky / I. M. Derik // Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, III (12), Issue: 60, 2015. — P. 31–35. [in Ukrainian].

Karasik V. I. Jazykovoj krug: lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs / V. I. Karasik. — Volgograd: Peremena. — 2002. — 477 p. [in Russian].

Stepanov Ju.S. Al’ternativnyj mir, Diskurs, fakt i princip prichinnosti/ Ju.S. Stepanov // Jazyk i nauka konca 20 veka. — M.: RAN, 1996. — P. 37–73. [in Russian].

Dijk van T. A. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis / T. A. van Dijk // The sociolinguistic Reader. — 1998. — Vol. 2: Gender and Discourse. — P. 367–393. [in English].

Gruschko S. P., Korolowa Т. M., Popowa О. V.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2018-27-9

Key words: hermeneutics, information, interpretation, text, translation, communication.

The article focuses on the problems of translation in the field of hermeneutics, understood as a methodology in the activity of an interpreter, the doctrine of the interpretation of texts, as a component of the transmission of information in a communicative aspect. The relevance of the study is caused by the special attention of modern linguistics to the under-researched issues of hermeneutics related to the problems of transmission of foreign language text semantics in translation.

REFERENCES

Beljanin V. P. Jeksperimental’noe issledovanie psiholingvisticheskih zakonomernostej smyslovogo vosprijatija teksta: dis. … kand. filol. nauk / V. P. Beljanin. — M., 1983. — 23 c. [in Russian].

Gal’perin I. R. Tekst kak ob#ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovanija / I. R. Gal’perin. — M.: Nauka, 1981. — 324 c. [in Russian].

Morkovina I. Ju. Vlijanie lingvisticheskih i jekstralingvisticheskih faktorov na ponimanie teksta: dis. … kand. filol. nauk / I. Ju. Morkovina. — M., 1982. — 23 s. [in Russian].

Shlejermaher F. Germenevtika / F. Shlejermaher; [per. s nem. A. L. Vol’skogo] — SPb.: “Evropejskij Dom”, 2004. — 242 s. [in Russian].

Stolze R. The Translator’s Apporach — Introduction to Translational Hermeneutics. Theory and Examples from Practice. — Berlin: Frank & Timme. — Режим доступу: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 275598737_Stolze_Radegundis_2011_The_Translator’s_Approach_Introdu ction_to_ Translational_ Hermeneutics_Theory_and Examples_ from_ Practice [in English].

Gruschko S. P.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2018-27-8

Key words: communicative-functional approach, interlingual communication, translation, structure

The article investigates the role of communicative-functional approach in the translation of scientific and technical literature, when the translation itself is seen as a tool to accomplish purposeful activity of communicators, representatives of different interlingual groups. In practical terms, the difficulties of translating scientific and technical texts are due to the peculiarities of scientific style, insufficient understanding of the terminology of a particular field of knowledge, which complicates the choice of adequate translation solutions. In this context, an important role is played by the translation strategy, where the communicative-functional approach dominates. The translation is implicitly included in the communication structure between the author and the recipient. The relevance of the article is determined by the necessity of studying the problems of scientific and technical literature translation, taking into account the current realities of interlanguage information exchange.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

Komissarov V. N. Theory of translation (linguistic aspects) / V. N. Komissarov. — Moscow: Higher School, 1990. — 253 p.

Sdobnikov V. V. Typology of translation: communicative and functional approach / V. V. Sdobnikov // Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University named after Dobrolyubov. Series “Linguistics and Intercultural Communication.” Vol. 10. — Nizhny Novgorod, 2010a. — P. 132–143.

Sdobnikov V. V. Communicative effect in bilingual communication: clarification of the concept / V. V. Sdobnikov // Modern Problems of the Private Translation Theory: Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Vol. 9 (588). — Moscow: IPK MSLU “Rema”, 2010b. — P. 121–130.

Fedorov A. V. Introduction to the theory of translation (Linguistic problems) / A. V. Fedorov. — 2nd ed. — M.: Publishing House of Foreign Literature. — 1958. — 376 p.

Byrne J. Are Technical Translators Writing Themselves Out of Existence? / J. Byrne // The Translator as Writer. Portsmouth, University of Portsmouth. 2010. — P. 14–27.

Nida E. A. Fascinated by Languages / E. A. Nida. — Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003. — 157 p.

Glushenko V. A. pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2018-27-7

Key words: the Russian literary language, verb, postfix -ся (-sya), form-building and word-building functions, voice of a verb.

The article is devoted to Ye. F. Shyrokorad’s research into the history of verb forms ending in -ся (-sya) in the Russian literary language. The scientist’s contribution to the issue of reflexive forms of Russian verbs is revealed. Having studied the considerable empirical material (M. V. Lomonosov’s and his contemporaries’ works) and concepts of a number of scientists drew Ye. F. Shyrokorad arrived at the conclusion that postfix -ся (-sya) performs in Russian both form-building and word-building functions and that the category of verb forms ending in -ся (-sya) in the Russian literary language of the mid XVIII ct. can be defined as rather formed.

REFERENCES

Bondar, K. K yubileyu uchitelya. Pamyati E. F. Shirokorad. URL: http://uapryal.com.ua/k-yubileyu-uchitelya-pamyati-e-f-shirokorad/ [In Russian].

Gluschenko, V. A. (2002) Volshebniy, charuyuschiy…Slavyansk: SGPI, [In Russian].

Gluschenko, V. A. (2009) Lingvisty Ukrainy: Efrosiniya Fominichna Shirokorad. Slavyansk [In Russian].

Karnaushenko, H. (2008) Efrosyniya Khomivna Shirokorad — professor Kharkivskogo natsionalnoho universitetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Kharkiv: KhNU sm. V. N. Karazina [In Ukrainian].

Karnaushenko, H. (1998) Efrosyniya Khomivna Shirokorad: naukovets I pedagog: (do 70-littya z dnya narodzhennya). Kharkiv [In Ukrainian].

Shirokorad, E. Kh. (1967) Vyvchennya kategorii stanu rosiyskogo ta ukrayinskogo diyeslova u radyanskomu movoznavsti. Kharkiv [In Ukrainian].

Shirokorad, E. F. (1958) Vozvratnyye glagoly vzaimnogo i sovmestnogo deystviya v yazike proizvedeniy M. V. Lomonosova. Kharkiv [In Russian].

Shirokorad, E. F. (1958) Glagolnyye obrazovaniya na –sya v literaturnom yazike serediny XVIII veka (na materiale yazika proizvedeniy M. V. Lomonosova). Kharkov [In Russian].

Shirokorad, E. F. (1958) Glagolnyye obrazovaniya na –sya v literaturnom yazike serediny XVIII veka (na materiale yazika proizvedeniy M. V. Lomonosova). Kharkov [In Russian].

Shirokorad, E. Kh. (1965) Do pytannya pro kategoriyu stanu v suchasnykh skhidnoslovyanskyh movah. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].

Shirokorad, E. F. (1963) Dopolneniye pri glagolakh mysli v sovremennom russkom literaturnom yazike. Rostov-na-Donu [In Russian].

Shirokorad, E. F. (1964) Iz grammaticheskogo naslediya M. V. Lomonosova. [In Russian].

Shirokorad, E. F. (1965) K voprosu o prirode stradatelnykh form v russkom yazike. Kharkov [In Russian].

Shirokorad, E. F. (1958) Stradatelniye glagolniye formy na –sya v yazike proizvedeniy M. V. Lomonosova. Kharkiv [In Russian].