Skip to content

Category: Issue #34

pdfTetiana Korolova

Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of Translation,
Theoretical and Applied Linguistics of the State Institution
“South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University
named after K. D. Ushynsky”

Odesa, Ukraine

e-mail: kortami863@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–3441–196X

Olga Aleksandrova

Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor at the Department
of Foreign Languages for Humanities, Odessa I. I. Mechnikov
National University

Odesa, Ukraine

e-mail: olgaaleks2016@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/ 0000–0002–1224–5916

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2022-34-13

Key words: sociolinguistic system, communicative behavior, youth sociolect, socially marked elements.

SUMMARY

The study of socio-intellectual forms of language meets the needs of modern linguistics that considers language in close connection with an individual, his mentality and worldview. In general, the modern scientific paradigm is based on the principle of conditional linguistic differentiation in a heterogeneous society. In this context, youth language is an important area of linguistic research, being a clear indicator of the current state of society and language variability. In the sociolect of youth (SY) all the processes of a natural language develop many times faster and are available for direct observation.

The structure of lexical, grammatical and phonetic systems of modern SY in the Ukrainian and English languages is considered in the work. The lexical structure includes the standard segment and the substandard (sociolect) segment, within which certain stylistically reduced and socially marked structural elements are distinguished, the quantitative and qualitative structure of these elements creates a partial situation of socio-stylistic lexical diglossia due to the lot of substandard lexicons.

The grammatical parameters of SY demonstrate differential peculiarities of their functioning as an oral dialogic type of speech and sociolinguistic parameters of communicators. Emotional coloring, spontaneity, situation peculiarities determine the presence of certain features of SY grammatical subsystem, which are represented by variable types of expressive syntax, certain means of morphological level. The low frequency of substandard elements at the grammatical level, the sporadic nature of their manifestation does not give grounds to single out the substandard grammatical subsystem within the CY.

Sociolinguistic characteristics of SY carriers and sociolinguistic parameters of youth communication determine the emotional and modal tension of speech among the youth, which is actualized by a set of phonetic parameters

REFERENCES

Balabin, V. V. (2002). Suchasnyi amerykanskyi viyskovyi slenh yak problema perekladu [Modern American military slang as a problem of translation]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Balli, Sh. (2003). Yazyk i zhizn [Language and life]. Moscow: URSS [in Russian].

Bodnar, R. V. (2007). Sotsiolekt pidlitkiv yak subkultura suchasnoho linhvosotsiumu (na materiali anhliyskoyi movy 90-kh rokiv ХХ — pochatku ХХІ stolittia) [Sociolect of adolescents as a subculture of modern linguistic society (based on the English language of the 90s of the XX — early XXI century)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Hrabovyi, P. M. (2010). Kohnityvni parametry ukrayinskoho molodizhnoho slenhu [Cognitive parameters of Ukrainian youth slang]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Karpets, L. A. (2006). Ukrayinskyi sportyvnyi zharhon: strukturno-semantychnyi aspekt [Ukrainian sports jargon: structural-semantic aspect]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian]. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Coleman J. The Life of Slang. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2012. 354 p.

Ehmann H. Ein paar Facts voraus. Das neuste Lexikon der Jugendsprache. München : Verlag C. H. Beck, 2001. 195 p.

Labov W. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Second edition. Cambridge : Cambridge U. Press, 2006. P. 168–178. Neuland E. Jugendsprache.

Tubingen und Basel : Fraucke Verlag, 2008. 210 p.

pdfLiudmyla Yavorska

Teacher at the Department of Translation and Theoretical and Applied Linguistics
of the State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University
named after K. D. Ushynsky”
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: Yavorska.LP@pdpu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0001–8700–1505

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2022-34-12

Key words: linguistics, speech communication, dialogical speech, interrogatives, variability

SUMMARY

The variability of English interrogatives, the algorithm for their formation and usage are of unreserved interest to linguists, scientists, teachers, graduates. The identified theme is especially popular in contemporary scientific researches because it is one of the most prevalent and important ones. The reason for such interest is the fact that the speech communication occupies the most prominent place among modern means of interaction, and the dialogic speech itself is an inherent part of speech communication, both verbal and written. But it is impossible to imagine any dialogue without interrogatives, which are a trigger, that is an initial impulse provoking the development of the communication process.

The purpose of the article is to study the variability of English simple interrogatives depending on their word order and functions.

This publication presents an essay on the study of the structural varieties of English simple interrogative sentences in the process of the dialogical speech as the most important means of communication; the analysis of modern linguistic studies directly related to the interrogatives investigation was carried out; the functional meaning and different locations of particular sentence members in the general structure of interrogative sentences were considered, 5 structural types of English simple interrogatives were selected, and the directions for further research on the theme were defined. To be consistent with the scientific principles, authenticity, and practical implementation of the obtained results, our study was conducted on the basis of selective material from the popular novel by American writer Jerome David Salinger “The Catcher in the Rye”. 

REFERENCES

Close R. A. (1975). A Reference Grammar for Students of English. Longman, 342 p [in
English].

Jespersen O. (1992). The Philosophy of Grammar. University of Chicago Press. 372 p [in English].

Salinger J. D. (2010). The Catcher in the Rye. Penguin. UK. 240 p [in English].

Dudenko O. V. (2015). Sintaksis ukrayinskoyi movi. Uman: VPC «Vizavi». 208 p [in Ukrainian].

Dudik P. S., Prokopchuk L. V. (2010). Sintaksis ukrayinskoyi movi. K. : VC «Akademiya». 380 p [in Ukrainian].

Korsakov A. K. (2013). Teoretichni osnovi suchasnoyi anglijskoyi gramatiki. Ch.1: Sintaksis. Kiyiv: Visha shkola, Odesa: VMV. 344 p [in English].

Romanyuk O. S. (2019). Uspishna komunikativno-pragmatichna model realizaciyi feminnoyi pragmatichno-interogativnoyi komunikativnoyi taktiki. Lingvistichni doslidzhennya: Zbirnik naukovih prac Harkivskogo nacionalnogo pedagogichnogo universitetu imeni G. S. Skovorodi. Vip. 50. pp. 203–209. URL: https://doi.org/10.34142/23127546.2019.5 0.25 [in Ukrainian].

Romanyuk O. S. (2019). Feminnij Romantichnij Diskurs: strategichni shlyahi realizaciyi pragmatichno-interogativnoyi komunikativnoyi taktiki. Visnik Universitetu imeni Alfreda Nobelya. Seriya «Filologichni nauki». Vip. 1(17). pp. 296–305. URL: https://doi.org/10.32342/2523–4463–2019–0-16–32 [in Ukrainian].

Yavorska L. P., Yasinska T. O. (2022). Strukturna variativnist anglijskih interogativiv u
dialogichnomu movlenni. V Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktichna konferenciya «Theoretical and applied aspects of the application of modern science». Sekciya: filologiya. Tokio, Yaponiya. pp. 369–372 URL: https://eu-conf.com/events/theoretical-and-applied-aspects-of-the-application-of-modern- cience/?utm_source=eSputnik-promo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=_EU-CONF-Sbornik_materialov_konferencii_opublikovan&utm_content=1404294644 [in Ukrainian].

pdfTetyana Yablonska

Doctor of pedagogical sciences, professor of the Department of West
and Oriental Languages and Methods of Their Teaching,
State Institution «South Ukrainian National Pedagogical
University named after K. D. Ushinsky»
Odessa, Ukraine

e-mail: applle9@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–6801–8704
Researcher ID: I-532402018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2022-34-11

Key words: phrasal verbs, Phraseology, context, Lexicology, English Language, polysemy, synonymy.

SUMMARY

The relevance of the English Language learning is substantiated in the article for many reasons. First, because of its international meaning in the whole world. Secondly, due to the huge variety of vocabulary, the presence of emotionally coloured set phrases, turns, idioms, phraseological units, proverbs, sayings and phrasal verbs. Thirdly, due to its emotional coloring, individuality and the presence of words of Greek, Latin and French origin.

The article considers the specifics of the use of phrasal verbs in English Lexicology classes. Such teaching methods as descriptive (for a general description of the context of a phrasal verb in English); contextual-interpretive (to identify the functional and semantic meaning of a phrasal verb), as well as a method of creating a problem situation with the help of a phrasal verb. The essence of the term «phrasal verbs» is defined; the place of phrasal verbs in the English Lexicology is considered and the features of phrasal verbs usage in this discipline are determined.

The features of perception and memorization of phrasal verbs are considered. Attention is paid to the classification of phrasal verbs. It has been proven that phrasal verbs are one of the most difficult moments regarding mastering the English language, but despite this, it is thanks to their use in the context that the English language becomes more «alive», extraordinary and emotionally colored, and in turn, the constant study of phrasal verbs and the use of their meanings in the context contributes to the memorization of new lexical units through associations, images and situations.

REFERENCES

Dido, N. D. (2016) Do pytannya vyvchennya frazovyh diesliv v angliyskiy movi. Modern studies in foreign philology. Uzhgorod. № 14., 34–39.(On the question of studying phrasal verbs in English) [in Ukrainian].

Kato Lomb (2016) Kak ya izuchay yazyki. Zametki poliglota. Personal Development. Izdvo Mann, Ivanov i Feber (How I Study Languages. Edition Mann, Ivanov and Feber [in Russian].

Nikolenko, A. G. (1999) Aktualizatsiya semantychnogo aspektu frazovyh diesliv u protsesi navchannya angliyskoyi movy. Foreign Languages. Kyiv. № 4., 31–33. (Actualization of the semantic aspect of phrasal verbs in the process of learning English)[in Ukrainian].

Povey, D. (1984) Govorite pravilno po angliysky. Moscow: Higher School (Speak correctly in English) [in Russian].

Smith, L. P. (1998) Frazeologiya angliyskogo yazyka. Perevod s angliyskogo. Moscow:
Drofa (English phraseology) Translation from English [in Russian].

Chaenkova, O. K. (2019) Lingvokulturna spetsyfika frazeologizmiv u protsesi perekladu (na materiali ukrainskoyi, turetskoyi ta angliyskoyi mov). Language.

Scientific and Theoretical Journal. № 31., Ukraine. Odessa. 41—54. (Linguocultural Specificity of Phraseological Units in Translating Process (on the Material of Ukrainian, Turkish and English Languages) [in Ukrainian].

pdfAnastasiia Yumrukuz

PhD (Candidate of philological sciences), associate professor, head of the department of western and oriental languages and methods of their teaching, state institution “South Ukrainian national pedagogical university named after K. D. Ushynsky”
Odesa, Ukraine

e-mail: yumrukuz.aa@pdpu.edu.ua
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000–0001–8644–8655;
Researcher ID: M-8713–2018

Juliana Irkhina

PhD (Candidate of pedagogical sciences), associate professor of the department
of western and oriental languages and methods of their teaching, state institution
“South Ukrainian national pedagogical university named after K. D. Ushynsky”
Odesa, Ukraine

e-mail: irhinajuliana@gmail.com,
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–9884–4732;
Researcher ID: AAF-2405–2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2022-34-10

Ключові слова: лінгвокультурні реалії, алюзія, політичні промови, інавгураційна промова, переклад

SUMMARY

The paper is focused on the study of linguistic means of rendering lingual and cultural realia conveyed by allusions in English political speeches and their Ukrainian translation. It is argued that allusions are among those linguistic means which not only provide the factual information, but also carry nationallymarked load. The authors maintain that despite the presence of some fundamental studies devoted to structural and semantic aspects of allusions, the ways of preserving and reflecting certain lingual and cultural information in the Ukrainian translations of English texts, the issue of rendering this information conveyed by allusions in the texts of English (American) political speeches has not been sufficiently investigated. Thus, the aforementioned justifies the urgent character of the given research. The work aimed at determining the tactics and linguistic means of representing lingual and cultural realia in the texts of English inaugural speeches and their Ukrainian translations.

The conducted study revealed that allusions in the analyzed texts render lingual and cultural information alluding to both textual and non-textual referents. The textual referents are represented by one’s own previous speeches, speeches of other politicians, biblical texts, folklore works, texts of state documents etc.; non-textual referents are the names of historical events, historical buildings, geographical features etc. The difficulty in preserving the lingual and cultural information in the translation can be justified by several factors, such as difficulties with identifying allusions in the text in case of non-nominated allusions as well as selection of the appropriate tactics of translation. The analysis proved that the linguistic and cultural information contained in allusions is mostly preserved in Ukrainian translations of the corresponding English-language texts of political speeches. Herewith, the kind of translation tactics and techniques depend on the type of the allusion — direct allusions are most commonly translated with the employment of transcription, transliteration, translation loans; indirect allusions —
by means of contextual substitution, transposition, extension and omission

REFERENCES

Ananina, M. A. & Uskova, B. A. (2014). Trudnosti peredachi lingvokulturnoy informatsii pri perevode alluziy na russkiy yazyk [Difficulties in rendering lingual and cultural information in the translation of allusions into the Russian language]. Lingua mobilis, 2 (48), 21–25 [in Russian].

Ben Porot (2018). The Poetics of Literary Allusion. A Journal for descriptive poetics and theory of literature. 1, 109–121 [in English].

Halperin, I. R. (2016). Tekst kak objekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic studies]. 7 ed. Moscow: KomKniga [in Russian].

Kopylna, O. M. (2007). Vidtvorennia avtorskoi aliuzii v khudozhniomu perekladi (namateriali ukrainskykh perekladiv anhlomovnoi prozy XX stolittia) [Rendering author’s allusions in the translation of fiction texts 9on the material of Ukrainian translations of English prose of XX century). Candidate’s thesis, Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Krassa, A. V. (2012). Problemy peredachi i sposoby perevoda alluzii v zagolovkakh britanskikh i amerikanskikh SMI [Problems of rendering and ways of translating allusions in headings of British and American media]. Samara: Aspekt, 1, 289–296 [in Russian].

Mizin, K. I. & Petrov, O. O. (2018). Zistavna lingvokulturolohiia: metodolohichni problem ta perspektyvni metodyky: monograph [Comparative linguistic and cultural studies: methodological problems and prospective methods]. Pereiaslav-Khmelnitskyi — Vinnytsya — Kremenchuk: PP. Shcherbatykh P. V. [in Ukrainian].

Nikashina, N. V., Suprun N. D. (2016). Allusiya kak stilisticheskiy priyem v angloyazychnoy literature [Allusion as a stylistic device in English literature]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika — Bulletin of RUDN. Series: Language theory. Semiotics. Semantics, 1, 68–74 [in Russian].

Pavlenko, O. (2012). Zasoby vidtvorennia deformovannykh aluzii v khudozhniomu perekladi [Means of rendering deformed allusions in the translation of the fiction]. Sotsiokulturni ta etnolinhvistychni problem haluzevoho perekladu v paraduhmi yevrointehratsii — Sociocultural and ethnolinguistic problems of the field translation in the eurointegration paradigm: Proceedings from the conference, Kyiv, 128–134 [in Ukrainian].

Petryna, Kh. V. (2019). Funktsionalno-semantychnyi analiz aliuzii v ukrainskykh postmodernistskykh khudozhnikh tekstakh [Functional and semantic analyzsis of allusions in Ukrainian post-modern fiction texts]. Candidate’s thesis. Ivano-Frankivsk [in Ukrainian].

Sunko, N. O. (2016). Aliuziia yak marker intertekstualnosti v anhliiskomu hazetnomy
zaholovku [Allusion as a marker of intertextuality in English newspaper headings]. Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis, Chernivtsi [in Ukrainian].

Zahnitko, A. P. (2012). Slovnyk suchasnoyi linhvistyky: poniattia i terminy [Dictionary of modern linguistics: concepts and terms]. (Vol. 1). Donetsk [in Ukrainian].

pdfOksana Chernysh

Ph.D. in Philological Sciences, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor
at the Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics
Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University,
Zhytomyr, Ukraine
103, Chudnivska str., Zhytomyr, 10005, Ukraine

e-mail: chernyshoxana@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000–0002–2010–200X

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2022-34-9

Key words: discourse, Internet discourse, hypertextuality, interactivity, contextuality, procedurality

SUMMARY

The scientific article highlights the approaches to interpreting the notion of discourse. First, it considers the three most important approaches to defining this concept: formal, functional, and situational. Next, the article outlines constitutive, genre-stylistic, substantive, and formal-structural discourse categories. Finally, it analyses distinctive features of discourse, among which contextuality, personality, procedurality, theology, and the closed structure of discourse are distinguished, provided that textual information is available. Moreover, the article outlines the peculiarities of Internet discourse formation and highlights the approaches to its definition. Finally, it analyzes distinctive features of Internet discourse. It highlights its globality, the efficiency of information transfer, unlimited amount of information and possibility of its constant updating, accessibility, anonymity, visual decontextuality, interactivity, indirectness, emotionality, hypertextuality, hybridity, and equality, etc. The article proves that Internet discourse borrows the features of oral and written speech and acquires some distinctive features. In particular, Internet discourse is characterized by the lack of synchronous feedback, making it difficult to understand the perception of information by the recipient. In addition, this type of discourse is characterized by a relatively slow pace of Internet communication, complications or lack of communicative role change, lack of prosody and paralingual means, and the impossibility of live spontaneous speech as a reaction to what is heard. The article highlights the prospects for further research. It stresses the significance of studying the genre and stylistic features of Internet discourse and its structural and communicative-pragmatic features.

REFERENCES

Anisenko, O. Ju. (2004). Lingvistika i lingvisticheskoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire. [Linguistics and linguistic education in the modern world]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii, posvjashhennoj 100-letiju so dnja rozhdenija professora V. D. Arakina (g. Moskva 18–19 nojabrja 2004 g.) (pp. 125–127). M.: Prometej [in Russian].

Ahrenova, N. A. (2009). Internet-diskurs kak global’noe mezhkul’turnoe javlenie i ego jazykovoe oformlenie [Internet discourse as a global intercultural phenomenon and its linguistic design]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. M.. [in Russian].

Batsevych, F. (2005). Linhvistychna henolohiia: problemy i perspektyvy: Monohrafiia [Linguistic genealogy: problems and prospects: Monograph]. Lviv: PAIS, 264 s. [in Ukrainian].

Varlamova, E. V. (2006). Osobennosti germanskogo levoradikal’nogo Internet-diskursa [Features of the German radical left Internet discourse]. Candidate’s thesis. M. [in Russian].

Hudz, N. O. (2012). Internet-dyskurs yak nevidiemna skladova suchasnoi komunikatsii [Internet discourse as an integral part of modern communication]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Filolohichni nauky. Vyp. 4 (70). S. 228–232. [in Ukrainian].

Dudoladova, O. V. (2008). Internet-dyskurs yak osoblyvyi typ dyskursu [Internet discourse as a special type of discourse]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V. N. Karazina. № 837. S. 74–78. [in Ukrainian].

Zvegincev, V. A. (1976). Predlozhenie i ego otnoshenie k jazyku i rechi [The sentence and its relation to language and speech]. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta. [in Russian].

Ivanov, L. Ju. Jazyk interneta: zametki lingvista [Internet language: notes of a linguist]. Retrieved from: http://www.twirpx.com/file/751186 [in Russian].

Karasik, V. I. (2004). Jazykovoj krug: lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. M.: Gnozis. 477 s.

Karpa, I. B. (2010). Funktsionalni ta prahmatychni kharakterystyky interaktyvnoi virtualnoi komunikatsii (na materiali informatsiino-dovidkovoho servisu Yahoo! Answers) [Functional and pragmatic characteristics of interactive virtual communication (based on the information and reference service Yahoo! Answers)]. Kherson. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. 20 s. [in Ukrainian].

Karpenko, M. Iu. (2016). Linhvistychni osoblyvosti Internet-dyskursu [Linguistic features of Internet discourse]. Mova. № 26. S. 5–11. [in Ukrainian].

Lukashenko, N. H. (2006). Ispanomovnyi Internet-dyskurs: komunikatyvno-prahmatychnyi ta linhvostylistychnyi aspekty (na materiali forumiv z problematyky rodynnykh stosunkiv) [Spanish-language Internet discourse: communicative-pragmatic and linguistic-stylistic aspects (based on forums on family relations)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv. 22 s. [in Ukrainian].

Podol’skaja, (2006). E. A. Slovar’ obshhestvennyh nauk: filosofija, religiovedenie, kul’turologija, politologija, sociologija, jetika, jestetika [Dictionary of Social Sciences: Philosophy, Religious Studies, Cultural Studies, Political Science, Sociology, Ethics, Aesthetics]. Rostov n/D.: Feniks. 475 s. [in Russian].

Potapova, R. K. (2001). Rech’: kommunikacija, informacija, kibernetika [Speech: communication, information, cybernetics]. M.: URSS. 568 s. [in Russian].

Raspopina, E. Ju. (2012). Strategicheskij aspekt informacionnogo zhanra internet-diskursa [Strategic aspect of the information genre of Internet discourse]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Irkutsk. 21 s. [in Russian].

Rizhkov, M. S. Precedentnye personazhi sinhronnogo internet-diskursa [Precedent Characters of Synchronous Internet Discourse]. Retrieved from: http://lse2010.narod.ru/lcseissue8/ [in Russian].

Romanov, O. V. Ontologicheskie i gnoseologicheskie problemy filosofii Interneta (Genezis i sintez fundamental’nyh idej) [Ontological and epistemological problems of the philosophy of the Internet (Genesis and synthesis of fundamental ideas)]. Retrieved from: http://www. dslib.net/ontologia/ontologicheskie-i-gnoseologicheskie-problemy-filosofii-interneta.html [in Russian].

Selivanova, O. O. (2011). Osnovy teorii movnoi komunikatsii [Fundamentals of the theory of language communication]. Cherkasy: Vyd-vo Chabanenko Yu.A.. 350 s. [in Ukrainian].

Selivanova, O. O. (2011). Linhvistychna entsyklopediia [Linguistic encyclopedia]. Poltava: Dovkillia-K. 844 s. [in Ukrainian].

Stepanov, Ju.S. Al’ternativnyj mir, diskurs, fakt i princip prichinnosti [Alternative world, discourse, fact and principle of causality]. Retrieved from: http://abuss.narod.ru/Biblio/stepanov.htm [in Russian].

Shkvorchenko, N. (2019). Internet-dyskurs yak linhvistychna katehoriia [Internet discourse as a linguistic category]. Aktualni pytannia humanitarnykh nauk. Vyp. 23. Tom 3. S. 62– 68. [in Ukrainian].

Brown, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 283 p. [in English].

Crystal, D. (2004). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 272 p. [in English].

Harris, Z. (1952). Discourse Analysis. Language. Vol. 28, № 17. P. 1–30. [in English].

pdfInna Stupak

Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor, Professor at the Department of Western
and Oriental Languages and Methods of their Teaching, State Institution “South Ukrainian
National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”
Odesa, Ukraine

e-mail: stupakinna@pdpu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0001–8029–4579

Anastasiya Shalamay

Post Graduate Student at the Department of Western and Oriental Languages
and Methods of their Teaching, State Institution “South Ukrainian National
Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: shalamay.ao@pdpu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–2868–8770

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2022-34-8

Key words: discourse; media discourse; multimedia discourse; multimodal discourse; multimodal text.

SUMMARY

This article seeks to analyse and compare the different definitions of the terms “discourse”, “text” and “media discourse”. The aim of the study is to specify the meaning of the abovementioned terms as well as investigate the characteristic features of multimedia discourse as a type of media discourse. The methods that have been used in this research are literature review, analogy and synthesis. The research findings have shown that there are two main approaches to defining “discourse”, namely as a text or collection of texts or as an interactive event. A distinction has also been made between the terms “discourse” and “text”, in that “discourse” is commonly viewed as an interactive process, while “text” is seen as its final product. Further examination of media discourse in particular has exposed a terminological problem when comparing the works of Ukrainian and foreign researchers. The reason for that is the different semantics of the concept “media” in the Ukrainian and English languages, namely using the word “media” only as a synonym of “mass-media” in Ukrainian, which in turn affects the understanding of the term “media discourse” as well. In order to solve this and to help avoid ambiguity, this paper offers to divide the concept “media discourse” into two hyponyms: mass-media discourse and multimedia discourse. The latter is best described as a highly multimodal entity. By analogy with the features of multimodal texts, a list of defining characteristics of multimedia discourse has been compiled, which includes: using several modes to create and to convey meaning; equal potential of each mode in meaning-making; achieving coherence and cohesion by using all the available modes; the importance of the social context in generating meaning.

REFERENCES

Andrieieva, I. O. (2016). Multymodalnyi analiz dyskursu: metodolohichna osnova ta perspektyvy napryamu [Multimodal discourse analysis: the methodological basis and perspectives of the field]. Odessa Linguistic Journal, 7, 3–8 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32837/olj.v1i7.450

Batsevytch, F. S. (2002). Terminolohiia komunikatyvnoi linhvistyky: aspekty dyskursyvnoho pidkhodu [Terminology of Communicative Linguistics: the Aspects of the Discourse Approach]. Bulletin: Problems of Ukrainian Terminology. Lviv: National University “Lvivska Polytehnyka”. 453, 30–34 [in Ukrainian].

Batsevytch, F. S. (2004). Osnovy komunikatyvnoi linhvistyky [The Fundamentals of Communicative Linguistics]. Kyiv : Akademia [in Ukrainian].

Benveniste E. (1970). L’appareil formel de nonciation. Langages № 17, 12–18.

Brown, G., Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Cambridge Dictionary | English Dictionary, Translations & Thesaurus. URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ (accessed on 24.11.2021).

Cook, G. (1980). Discourse. Oxford University Press.

Dijk, V. T. A. (1977). Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.

Dijk, V. T. A. (1985). Discourse and Communication (Research in Text Theory) (1st ed.). De Gruyter.

Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic Criticism. Oxford University Press.

Harris, Z. (1951). Methods in Structural Linguistics. University of Chicago Press.

Harris, Z. (1952). Discourse Analysis. Language, 28, pp. 1–30.

Hodge, R., Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics (1st ed.). Cornell University Press.

Kalinichenko, O. M. (2016). Multymodalnist khudozhnoho tekstu: napriamy linhvopoetychnykh doslidzhen [Multimodality of Fictional Text: the Tendencies of Linguo-poetical Research]. Scientific Herald of International Humanitarian University. Series: Philology. 2 (21), 42–45. [in Ukrainian].

Koroliova, V. V. (2017). Taksonomiia dyskursiv u novitnikh linhvistychnykh studiiakh
[Taxonomy of Discourses in Modern Linguistic Research]. Journal «Language and Intercultural Communication». 1, 206–214. [in Ukrainian].

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge.

Kress, G. (2012). Multimodal discourse analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 35–50). Routledge.

Kress, G., Leeuwen, V. T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication (1st ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Lemke, J. L. (2012). Multimedia and discourse analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 79–89). Routledge.

Li, Z., Drew, M. S., Liu, J. (2021). Fundamentals of Multimedia (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing. Liebert, W., Metten, T. (2013). Multimodal text. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 4336–4338.

Martyniuk, A. P. (2011). Slovnyk osnovnykh terminiv kohnityvno-dyskursyvnoi linhvistyky [The Dictionary of the Basic Terms of Cognitive-Discourse Linguistics]. Kharkiv : KhNU named after V. N. Karazin [in Ukrainian]

pdfTetiana Stoianova

Candidate of Philology, Lecturer of the Department
of Translation and Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, State Institution
“South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine

e-mail: t.v.stoianova@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–0424–6783

Victoria Shutyak

Master of Philology (English into Ukrainian translation) State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine

e-mail: viki1999sh@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–0532–2389

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2022-34-7

Key words: culinary discourse, culinary recipe, ethnocultural, linguistic culture, translation, translation transformations.

SUMMARY

The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of culinary discourse translation into Ukrainian on the example of culinary recipes. The aim of the research is to analyze the translation of culinary discourse texts on the example of recipes from the book “Jamie Oliver’s 30 Minute Meals”. The urgency of the work is due to the growing scientific interest in the translation of culinary texts in connection with the development of communications, due to which the gastronomic experience of different countries is rapidly spreading around the world, so culinary texts need adequate translation. As a result of the study, the authors conclude that the recipe as one of the key genres of culinary discourse has certain discursive features, a specific structure; however, modern recipes acquire certain genre modifications. An analysis of the translation of recipes revealed that the most commonly used grammatical transformations, represented by literal translation, syntactic transposition, grammatical permutations and substitutions, as well as addition and omission. It is determined that lexical transformations occur with medium frequency, such as: differentiation of meaning, partonymic and equonymic substitutions, concretization and modulation. The least common are lexical and grammatical transformations — holistic transformation and compensation for translation losses. It is established that the transformations used by translators allow better understanding the recipe, to understand the measures of the product, the ingredients. On the other hand, incorrect use of transformations leads to conceptually unsecured translation errors: the incorrect or incomprehensible name of ingredients, free interpretation of measures in the recipe, unnecessary clarifications leading to tautology were identified.

REFERENCES

Burkova P. P. (2004). Kulinarnyy retsept kak osobyy tip teksta (na materiale russkogo i nemetskogo yazykov) [Culinary recipe as a special type of text (based on the Russian and German languages)]: avtoref. diss.... kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.19 «Teoriya yazyka», 10.02.01 «Russkiy yazyk». Stavropol : Stavropolskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. [in Russian].

Derzhavetska I. O. (2013). Hliutonichna leksyka ta problemy yii perekladu [Glutonic
vocabulary and problems of its translation]. Vcheni zapysky Tavriiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia “Filolohia. Sotsialni komunikatsii”. T. 26 (65). № 1 S. 466–470. [in Ukrainian].

Kanturova M. A. (2012). Derivatsionnyy protsess modifikatsii v sisteme rechevykh zhanrov (na primere rechevogo zhanra kulinarnogo retsepta) [The derivational process of modification in the system of speech genres (on the example of the speech genre of a culinary recipe)].

Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 354. S. 16–18. [in Russian].

Kanturova M. A. (2011). Obrazovaniye vtorichnogo rechevogo zhanra kak derivatsionnyy protsess (na primere rechevogo zhanra kulinarnogo retsepta) [Formation of the secondary speech genre as a derivational process (on the example of the speech genre of a culinary recipe)]. II Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. 2. S. 222–226. [in Russian].

Kosinova M. A. (2018). Osobennosti terminologii gastronomicheskogo diskursa [Features of the terminology of gastronomic discourse]. URL: http://rep.barsu.by/bitstream/ handle/data/4314/Osobennosti %20 terminologii %20gastronomicheskogo %20diskursa. pdf?sequence=1. [in Russian].

Kulykova V., Kovalchuk M. (2016). Meniu yak riznovyd hastronomichnoho dyskursu:
perekladatskyi aspekt [Menu as a kind of gastronomic discourse: translation aspect]. Naukovyi dyskurs DDPU im. I. Franka. Seriya “Filolohichni nauky”. Movoznavstvo. T. 1. № 5. S. 176–179. [in Ukrainian].

Oliver Dzh. (2015). Smachni stravy za 30 khvylyn vid Dzheymi [Delicious food 30 minutes from Jamie] / Per. Oresta Stadnyka ta Kateryny Mykhalitsynoi. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Staroho Leva. [in Ukrainian].

Olyanich A. V. (2003). Gastronomicheskiy diskurs v sisteme massovoy kommunikatsii : semantiko-semioticheskiye kharakteristiki [Gastronomic discourse in the system of mass communication: semantic and semiotic characteristics.]. Massovaya kultura na rubezhe XX-XXI vekov: chelovek i yego diskurs. M.: RAN. In-t yazykoznaniya, S. 167–201. [in Russian].

Selivanova O. (2016). Nova typolohiia perekladatskykh transformatsii [A new typology of translation transformations]. URL: https://shag.com.ua/o-o-selivanova.html. [in Ukrainian].

Chernova Yu. V., Harashchenko T. S. (2018). Kulinarna terminolohiia ta problemy yii perekladu [Culinary terminology and problems of its translation]. Molodyi vchenyi. № 12 (64). S. 149–151. [in Ukrainian].

Oliver J. (2013). Jools’ Pasta. Jamie Oliver’s 30 Minute Meals. URL: https://hotcooking.
co.uk/recipes/jamie-oliver-30-minute-meals-pregnant-jools-pasta. [in English]. Oliver J. (2021). Jamie Oliver. Official website for recipes. URL: https://www.jamieoliver.com/. [in English].

pdfYuliia Stoianova

Postgraduate Student of the Department of Translation, Theoretical
and Applied Linguistics, State institution “South Ukrainian National
Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine

e-mail: stoyanova97@icloud.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0001–8534–7617

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2022-34-6

Key words: Confucianism, the spirit of teaching, Lun Yu, Confucius Analects, Confucius.

SUMMARY

The article analyzes the treatise of Confucius “Lun Yu”, which in terms of literature is the most important contribution to the development of education not only in China but also around the world. Confucianism (especially enlightenment ideas), represented by Confucius, is the mainstay of the traditional culture of the Chinese nation and is a spiritual support of the long-term development of the Chinese nation. Confucianism has played an indispensable role and significance in Chinese politics and society for over than two thousand years. In the long process of development of traditional Confucianism, the most fundamental reason why it can be distinguished from Taoism, Moism, yin-yang, as well as Buddhism, Western Christianity, Islam, etc. is the special attention to the moral education of people. Confucian education is a major focus of ancient Chinese education, it reflects the basic characteristics of Chinese classical cultural education and is an invaluable asset in the history of Chinese education and around the world. However, Confucian pedagogical thoughts have its own historical process of development, and its content and form of expression are not same at different historical stages, so to extract the essence and use the past for the present, we should first make a historical analysis of Confucian pedagogical thought.

Classic works of Confucius, Mencius, Records of Teaching, The Great Doctrine and a complete set of presented Confucian doctrines constitute the material for the study. The period of foundation of Confucian thought, the time when the theoretical foundations of Confucianism were laid, is analyzed

REFERENCES

“Chéngjiù zìshēn” de zhìhuì: Rújiā de dàodé zìzhǔ xìng hé zìwǒ fǎnsī [J]. Wáng Zhōngjiāng. Qílǔ xué kān. 2019 (06)

1949—1955 Nián zhōngguó dàlù kǒngzǐ yánjiū de lěngqīng jí qí chéngyīn [J]. Yánghóngyǔ, Wáng Jié. Lìshǐ jiàoxué wèntí. 2020 (04)

Fēilǐ cóng quán: Kǒngzǐ guānyú “fēilǐ” yánxíng de zhǔzhāng [J]. Hú Bówén. Rénwén tiānxià. 2020 (23)

Jīntiān wǒmen rúhé rènshí kǒngzǐ ‒ “chéngfāngpíng tán kǒngzǐ” píngjiè [J]. Fù Hǎiyàn. Jiàoyù shǐ yánjiū. 2021 (04)

Kǒngzǐ “lè jiào” xīn lùn [J]. Wángqízhōu. Tiānjīn shèhuì kēxué. 2021 (02)

Kǒngzǐ de lǐxiǎng réngé sān jìngjiè lùn jí xiànshí yìyì [J]. Niè Liàng, liúzémín. Húběi shèhuì kēxué. 2021 (02)

Kǒngzǐ duì rújiā “zhōngjí guānhuái” de diànjī ‒ yǐ “lúnyǔ” lùn “mìng” wéi lì [J]. Hánchuánqiáng. Xuéshù lùntán. 2010 (03)

Kǒngzǐ wèihé zài xīfāng “quān fěn” 400 nián [J]. Chénqíwěi, Zhào Lù. Fǎrén. 2021 (01)

Kǒngzǐ yǎnzhōng de “zhí” nán hé “zhí” dào [J]. Zhàojiǔgē. Tuánjié. 2021 (06)
Lúnyǔ [M]. Nánjīng chūbǎn shè, Jiǎngniànzǔ, 2019

Lúnyǔ xīn jiě [M]. Shēnghuó·dúshū·xīnzhī sānlián shūdiàn, Qiánmù, 2012

Lúnyǔ zhòng de míngyán [M]. Shànghǎi rénmín chūbǎn shè, nánhuáijǐn jiǎngshù, 2009

Qiǎn tán rújiā héxīn sīxiǎng dí dàng dài jiàzhí jí shíxiàn lùjìng [J]. Zhūyánjūn, Guōyànyàn. Kāshén dàxué xuébào. 2016(05)

Rújiā “xiào” wénhuà sùyuán ‒ yǐ “lúnyǔ” wèi héxīn [J]. Sòngzhènkūn. Míngzuò xīnshǎng. 2017(12)

Rújiā xuéxí mùdì bié yì [J]. Sūnhuáibīn, Dùyànchūn. Jiānghǎi xué kān. 1999(05)

Rújiā zhīdào de fǎ xiàn [J]. Xiètáofāng. Gǔdiǎn wénxué zhīshì. 2017(01) Shénme zuì zhídé xuéxí hé zhīxiǎo ‒ Lùn Kǒngzǐ de “xué dào” hé “zhī dào”[J]. Wáng Zhōngjiāng. Zhéxué Dòngtài. 2022(01)

Xiānqín shí rén yǎnzhōng de kǒngzǐ xíngxiàng tànxī [J]. Fùmàoxù. Hēilóngjiāng shèhuì kēxué. 2022(01)

Yánzhe kǒngzǐ de sīxiǎng lùxiàn ér xíng [J]. Liú Dōng. Dúshū. 2022(03)

Zǎoqí rújiā “wéi jǐ zhī xué” yǐ “xīnshù wéi zhǔ” de yìyì ‒ yǐ xīn guānniàn de qǐyuán hé shēnxīn guānxì wèi xiànsuǒ [J]. Kuāng Zhāo. Húběi shèhuì kēxué. 2021(09)

pdfOleksandra Popova

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Full Professor, Dean of the Foreign Languages Department,
State institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after
K. D. Ushynsky”
Odesa, Ukraine

e-mail: Alex-popova@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/ 0000–0002–6244–5473

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2022-34-5

Key words: economic and legal discourse, factors, academic sphere, structural and compositional form of the document, lexical and grammatical features of document text, English, Chinese, Ukrainian.

SUMMARY

The article is devoted to the study of the paradigm of changes in the content of official documents regulating economic and legal relations in the academic sphere in the XXI century. The author considers the factors influencing the process of changes in the content of official documents regulating economic and legal relations in the academic sphere in the context of the linguistic-translation paradigm. The concepts “economic and legal discourse”, “composition of the text of the document”, “academic sphere” have been clarified. Economic and legal discourse is determined through the prism of its dual nature (linguistic and extralinguistic) as a discourse of economics and law, education-driven discourse, its extralinguistic background being associated with the prerequisites for initiating elaborations in the area of education, for launching academic mobility programmes intended for participants of the teaching / learning process at the background of the native state development and intergovernmental cooperation. The text composition of the document is associated with the format (frame) of its representation, namely: the structural and compositional form of the document along with lexical and grammatical features of the economic and legal discourse. We interpret the academic sphere as the environment in which the acquisition of new knowledge, exchange of education-related information, implementation of scientific / research projects, practical manifestation of the outcomes, cultural exchange and intercultural communication take place due to the creation of certain conditions.

Some changes in the structure and composition of the documents regulating economic and legal relations in the academic sphere have been characterised. The linguistic peculiarities of the English official documents and their variants of translation into Chinese and Ukrainian have been analysed. The author presents illustrative means demonstrating the interaction of factors influencing the content of official documents which regulate economic and legal relations in the academic sphere in the XXI century.

REFERENCES

Volovyk, О. (2014). Pohliad na pravo i rozvytok ekonomiko-pravovoho dyskursu [A look at the law and development of economic and legal discourse]. Kyiv: «Yurinkom Inter». 272 p.

Cheng, L. (2010). A Semiotic Interpretation of Genre: Court Judgments as an Example. Semiotica, 182, рр. 89–113 [in English].

Fanego, T., & Rodríguez-Puente, P. (Eds.). (2019). Corpus-Based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse. Applied Linguistics, 40(5). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/ applin/amz052 [in English].

Ilchenko, O. M. (2002). Etyket anhlomovnoho naukovoho dyskursu: monohrafiia [Etiquette of English scientific discourse: a monograph]. Kyiv: IVTs «Politekhnika», 288 p [in Ukrainian].

Kravchenko, N. K. (2007). Mizhnarodno-pravovyi dyskurs: kohnityvno-komunikatyvnyi aspekt Міжнародно-правовий дискурс: когнітивно-комунікативний аспект [International legal discourse: cognitive-communicative aspect]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Murray, M. D. (2011). Law and Economics as a Rhetorical Perspective in Law. Law Faculty Publications. 2011, Paper 8. Retrieved from http://scholar.valpo.edu/law_fac_pubs/8 [in English].

Popova, O. V. (2021). Spetsyfika perekladu novitnikh kytaiskomovnykh naukovo-tekhnichnykh terminiv (na materiali kytaiskoi, anhliiskoi, nimetskoi, ukrainskoi ta rosiiskoi mov) [Translation Specificities of the Innovative Chinese Scientific and Technical Terms (on the material of Chinese, English, German, Ukrainian and Russian)]. Scientific Issues of South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky (Linguistic Sciences), 132, pp. 84–94 [in Ukrainian].

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge Applied Linguistics [in English].

pdfAlexander I. Iliadi

Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Department of Methods of Preschool and Primary Education at Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine

e-mail: alexandr.iliadi@gmail.com

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0001–5078–8316

Anastasiia A. Fedorova

Doctor of Philosophy in General Linguistics, Senior Lecturer of the department of the English Language and Communication of the Institute of Philology at Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University Kyiv, Ukraine

e-mail: a.fedorova@kubg.edu.ua

ORCID ID: https:// orcid.org/0000–0001–6927–1739

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2022-34-4

Key words: lexeme, sememe, law, Old English, context.

SUMMARY

The paper deals with a group of Old English lexemes with the meaning ʻpowerʼ, namely: wald/weald, mund, rīki/rīce, dōm. The use of wald/weald, mund, rīki/rīce, dōm in genre-variegated original texts gives grounds for referring them to the semantic field «Law», i.e., to a very important cluster of the vocabulary of the ancient Angles and Saxons. Working with words expressing the concept of «power», the authors set the goal of analyzing the semantic nuances that differentiate the use of OE wald, mund, etc., for which they solve several research tasks: 1) find out the sources of the semantics of ʻpowerʼ; 2) determine the conditions in which the sememe ʻpowerʼ developed on the basis of other meanings (contexts and, in one case, possibly the result of the influence of Latin as the language of law).

The analysis of the material gives reason to assume that the Old English contexts, where actual connections of the meanings of a single word are traced, do not always prove the fact that the sememe ʻpowerʼ appeared precisely in the Old English period, because in other ancient Germanic languages etymological analogues with a close semantic relationship are known. This fact indicates the probability of the Proto-Germanic age of the semantic shift

REFERENCES

Gamkrelidze T. V., Ivanov Viach. Vs. (1984). Indoêvropeyskiy âzyk i indoêvropeytsy. Rekonstruktsiâ i istoriko-tipologicheskiy analiz praâzyka i protokulʼtury [Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans. A Reconstruction and Historical Typological Analysis of a Protolanguage and a Proto-Culture]. Tbilisi : Izd-vo Tbilissk. un-ta. Т. II. [in Russian].

Grimm J. (2019). Deutsche Mythologie. T. I [transl., comm. by D. S. Koltshigin]. Мoscow : ÂSK [in Russian].

Gurevich A. Y. (2007). Izbrannyê trudy. Drevniê germantsy. Vikingi [Selected Works. Old Germans. Vikings]. S.-Petersburg : Izd-vo Sankt-Peterb. un-ta [in Russian].

Gukhman M. M., Zhirmunskiy V. M. (ed.) (1962). Sravnitelʼnaâ grammatica germanskikh âzykov [A Comparative Grammar of the Germanic Languages]. Moscow : AN USSR. Т. 1 [in Russian].

Iliadi A. I. (2022). Drevneangliyskiê antroponimy-kompozity [Old English Compound Anthroponyms]. Kropivnitskiy : [W. p.] [in Ukrainian].

Levitskiy V. V. (2010). Ètimologicheskiy slovarʼ germanskikh âzykov [An Etymological Dictionary of Germanic Languages]. Vinnitsa : Nova Knyga. T. 1 [in Russian].

Fedorova A. O. (2018). Stanovlennia pravovoyi terminologichnoyi semantyky v indoêvropeysʼkykh movakh [Formation of the legal terminological semantics in the Indo-European languages: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Philology]. Kropyvnytsʼkiy [in Ukrainian].

Bosworth J. D. D. (1921). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary (Based on the manuscript collections). Oxford : Clarendon press.

Buck C. D. (1949). A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European
Languages. A Contribution to the History of Ideas. Chicago, London : The University of Chicago Press.

Codex Exoniensis (1842). A Collection of Anglo-Saxon Poetry, from a Manuscript in the Library of the Dean and Chapter of Exeter [with an English Translation, Notes, and Indexes by Benjamin THORPE, F. S. A.]. London : William Pickering.

King Alfredʼs Anglo-Saxon Version of Boethius «De consolatione philosophiae» (1864). [with a literal English translation, notes, and glossary. By the rev. Samuel Fox, M. A.]. London : H. G. Bohn.

Lehman P. Winfred. (1986). A Gothic Etymological Dictionary. Leiden : B. J. Brill.

Libri psalmorum versio antiqua latina (1835). Cum paraphrasi Anglo-Saxonica, partim soluta oratione, partim metrice composita. Nunc primum [descripsit et edidit Benjamin Thorpe, S. A. S.]. Oxonii: E Typographeo Academico.

Orel V. (2003). A Handbook of Germanic Etymology. Leiden ; Boston : Brill.

Orosius (1859). King Alfred’s Anglo-Saxon Version of the Compendious History of the World [the rev. Joseph Bosworth]. London : Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, Paternoster-Row.

The Poetry of the Codex Vercellensis (1843). [with an English Translation by J. M. Kemble, M. A.]. London : Ælfric Society.

Thorpe B. (1846). Analecta Anglo-Saxonica. A Selection, in Prose and Verse, from AngloSaxon Authors of Various Ages; with a Glossary. London : Smith, Elder and Co.
Wyatt Alfred J. (ed.) (1919). An Anglo-Saxon Reader [Edited with notes and glossary by Alfred J. Wyatt]. Cambridge : University press.