Skip to content

Category: Issue #31

 

Olexandra Popova
pdf

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Translation and Theoretical and Applied Linguistics of the State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: alex-popova@ukr.net
ORCID: orcid.org/0000–0002–6244–5473

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2020-31-20

Oleg Bolgar

Master Student in Philology, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical
University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: 9939060@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000–0003–0029–9079

Tomashevska Anastasiia

Master Student in Philology, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical
University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: rittersmazicom@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org./0000–0001–2696

Key words: translation, stylistic devices, television interview, interviewer’s speech.

The work is devoted to the study of translation peculiarities of stylistic features of a TV interviewer’s English speech into Ukrainian. The correct translation of the content of a speech segment requires good knowledge of vocabulary, and the capability to recognize the stylistic features of a foreign language in communication, and the techniques used to translate them into the native language. Translation of metaphors, metonymy, comparisons is of particular difficulty for the translator, however, it is the ability to use various techniques in translation that helps the translator to convey the meaning of the statement to the listener adequately. The television interview is characterized as an independent journalistic genre, is a kind of television communication, a purposeful individual-social speech phenomenon, which consists of the organized interaction detween the speakers and finds its expression in a specific dialogically constructed form. The results of this study show that each translated stylistic unit is characterized by a set of transformations typical for it. In most cases, these transformations involve lexical and syntactic stylistic devices. At the level of vocabulary, the speech of a TV interviewer is characterized by a significant number of colloquialisms, colloquial cliches, phraseological units. At the level of syntax, the typical indicators of the conversational style of the TV nterviewer are parallel constructions, repeated requests, elliptical sentences, repetitions, unfinished phrases, and the absence of inversion in interrogative sentences. The information obtained as the result of convergence of stylistic devices as a set of components participating together with other linguistic units in the formation of expressiveness, emotiveness and evaluation is one of the important sources of the language pragmatic function.

REFERENCES

Alekseeva I. O. (2001). Semantyka ta prahmatyka anhliyskyh chastok: avtoreferat dysertatsii na zdobuttia naukovoho stupennia kandydata filolohichnyh nauk: spetsialnist 10.02.04 “Hermanski movy”. [Semantics and pragmatics of English particles: dissertation abstract for the degree of Candidate of Philological Sciences: specialty 10.02.04 “Germanic languages”]. K., 20 p. [in Ukrainian].
Apalat G. P. (2003). Struktura, semantyka i prahmatyka tekstiv-intervyu (na materiali suchasnoi anhlomovnoi presy): avtoreferat dysertatsii na zdobuttia naukovoho stupennia kandydata filolohichnyh nauk: spetsialnist 10.02.04 “Hermanski movy”. [Structure, semantics and pragmatics of interview texts (based on the material of the modern English-language press): dissertation abstract for the degree of Candidate of Philological Sciences: specialty 10.02.04  “Germanic languages”]. K., 19 p. [in Ukrainian].
Barannyk D. H. (1973). Stylistyka usnoho movlennia. [Stylistics of oral speech]. Suchasna ukrainska literaturna mova/ Za zagalnoyu redaktsiyeyu I. K. Bilodida. [Modern Ukrainian literary language]. K.: Naukova Dumka. — Kn.5. Stylistyka, 503–551 p. [in Ukrainian].
Chomsky N. Chronicales of dissent: interviews with David Barsamian. Scotland: AK
Press, Common Courage Press, 1992. — 398 p.
Hoian V. V. (1999). Informatsiina televiziina prohrama: typolohichna harakterystyka,
parametry diialnosti zhurnalista: avtoreferat dysertatsii na zdobuttia naukovoho stupennia kandydata filolohichnyh nauk: spetsialnist 10.01.08 “Zhurnalistyka”. [Information television program: typological characteristics, parameters of the journalist’s activity: dissertation abstract for the degree of Candidate of Philological Sciences: specialty 10.01.08 “Journalism”]. V. V. Hoian. — Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. K., 19 p. [in Ukrainian].
Huldzen L. S. Significant and nonsignificant in intination. Proc. Of the IV Intern. Congress of Phon. Sci., 1962. P. 658–661.
Kara-Murza S. G. (2002). Manipulatsyya soznaniem. [Manipulation of consciousness]. S. G. Kara-Murza. M.: EKMOSO-Press, 833 p. [in Russian].
Korunets I. V. Contrastive Typology of the English and Ukrainian Languages. Vinnytsa: Nova Khyga, 2003. 239 p.
Kyiak T. R., Ohui O. D., Naumenko A. M. (2006). Teoriia ta praktyka perekladu (nimetska mova). [Theory and practice of translation (German)]. Vinnytsia: Nova Knyha, 592 p. [in Ukrainian]. Nazarov M. M. (2000). Massovaya kommunikatsyya v sovremennom mire: metodologiya analiza i praktika isledovaniy. [Mass communication in the modern world: methodology of analysis and research practice]. M. M. Nazarov. — М.: URSS, 240 p. [in Russian].
Rozhdestvensky Yu.V. (1996). Obschaya filologiya. [General philology]. M.: Fond “Novoye Tysyacheletiye”, 326 p. [in Russian].
Rudenko O. V. (2007). Intonatsiini osoblyvosti oformlennia melodychnoho komponentu movlennia veduchoho televiziinoho intervyu. [Intonation features of the design of the melodic component of the speech of the leading TV interview]. Naukovyi Visnyk Pivdennoukrainskoho Natsionalnoho Pedahohichnoho Universytetu imeni K. D. Ushynskoho: Linhvistychni nauky. Astroprint — Scientific Research Issues of South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsy: Linguistic sciences. Astroprint 5, 57–66 p. [in Ukrainian].
Selivanova O. O. (2006). Suchasna linhvistyka: terminolohichna entsyklopediia. [Modern linguistics: terminological cyclopedia]. Poltava: Dovkillia — K, 716 p. [in Ukrainian].
Sychenkov V. V. (2000). Intervyu-portret v sisteme sovremennyh publitsesticheskih zhanrov. [Interview-portrait in the system of modern journalistic genres]. Vestnik Moskovskovo universiteta, 10, Zhurnalizm. — Bulletin of Moscow University. 10. Journalism, No 2. 108–115 p. [in Russian].
Vahanov O. V. (2003). Rol zasobiv masovoi komunikatsii u protsesi hlobalizatsii: avtoreferat dysertatsii na zdobuttia naukovoho stupennia kandydata filolohichnyh nauk: spetsialnist 23.00.03 “Politychna kultura ta ideolohiia”. [The role of mass media in the process of globalization: dissertation abstract for the degree of Candidate of Philological Sciences: specialty 23.00.03 “Political culture and ideology”]. Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. K., 14 p. [in Ukrainian].
Yermolenko S. Ya. (2000). Mova telebachennia i radio. [The language of television and radio]. S. Ya. Yermolenko // Ukrainska mova. Entsyklopediia. — К.: Vydavnytstvo “Ukrainska Entsyklopediia” imeni M. P. Bazhana, 324 p. [in Ukrainian].
Yerofeeva T. I. (1984). Lingvisticheskiye zametki o zhanre svobodnovo teleintervyu. [Linguistic notes on the genre of free TV interview]. Printsypy fiksirovaniya yazyka v evo rechevyh raznovidnoatyah — Principles of language functioning in its speech varieties : Mezhvuzovyy sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Perm, 73–81 p. [in Russian].

 

Tеtiana Korolоva
pdf

Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of Translation, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics of the State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: kortami863@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–3441–196X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2020-31-19

Tetiana Noriak

Master Student in Philology, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical
University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: tnoriak@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0001–6100–2884

Key words: explication, implication, dubbing, feature films, translation, translation operations.

The work is devoted to the analysis of the features of the dubbing process of English films into Ukrainian; special attention is paid to peculiarities of lexical semantics in the translated variants. The work is of experimental character: the total time of the researched material is 3000 minutes.
Among the established factors of pragmatic adaptation in the process of the film translation the most important one is the capability to reflect socio-cultural realities of the English-speaking community in the Ukrainian language. The adequacy and quality of the translation must produce the same communicative effect on the Ukrainian-speaking audience, which is aimed at the English-speaking audience. An adequate translation preserves speech behavior, political and economic realities.
Special attention is paid to the use of explication and implication techniques in the translation practice of dubbing. Both types of translation techniques are used in English-Ukrainian patterns. The explication of a word’s semantics can be structural or contextual. By structural explication we mean the introduction of additional word forms, caused by grammatical and sociocultural factors. In Ukrainian translations, there is a tendency for the widespread use of explication, in order to adequately reflect the meaning of communicative units and preserve a pragmatic impact on the audience.
The implication is rarely used in Ukrainian film-texts; it is caused not only by the need to synchronize the lipsing of the original and the translation, but also by the absence of certain cognitive phenomena in the national culture consciousness of the Ukrainians.
The undoubted advantage in the palette of the Ukrainian dubbing of ommunicative
means is associated with the traditions of the Ukrainian dubbing school which is characterized by the greatest flexibility in observing national stereotypes, the maximum domestication of other peoples’ realities. The Ukrainian actor, when portraying a foreigner, imposes serious restrictions on his own manner of reproducing the Ukrainian communicative system.

REFERENCES

Catford J. Translation Shifts The Translation Studies Reader. London: Routledge, 2000. P. 141–147.
Cherednychenko O. I., Koval Ya. H. (1981). Okazionalni vidpovidnyky i pereklad na
riznyh rivniah ekvivalentnosti. [Occasional equivalents and translation at different levels of equivalence]. Teoriia i praktyka perekladu: Respublikanskyi mizhvidomchyi naukovui zbirnyk – Theory and practice of translation: Republican Interdepartmental Scientific Collection. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola, 5, 72—77 p. [in Ukrainian].
Fedorov A. V. (2002). Osnovy obstchey teorii perevoda. Lingvisticheskiye problemy. [Foundations of the general theory of translation. Linguistic problems]. Sankt—Peterburg: Filologicheskiy fakultet Sankt—Peterburgskovo Gosudarstvennovo universiteta, 416 p. [in Russian].
Komissarov V. N. (2001). Sovremennoe perevodovedeniye. Uchebnoye posobiye. [Modern translation studies. Tutorial]. Moskva: ETS, 424 p. [in Russian].
Komissarov V. N. (1990). Teoriya perevoda (lingvisticheskiye aspekty): Uchebnik dlya institutov I fakultetov inostrannyh yazykov. [Translation theory (linguistic aspects): Textbook for institutes and faculties of foreign languages]. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola, 325 p. [in Russian].
Koptilov V. V. (2003). Teoriia i praktyka pereklady. [Theory and Practice of translation].  Kyiv: Vystcha shkola, 166 p. [in Ukrainian].
Korolova T. M., Оleksandrova O. V. (2016). Stylizatsiia sotsiolektu molodi v kino dialozi. [Stylization of youth sociolect in film dialogue.]. Naukovyi Visnyk Pivdennoukrainskoho Natsionalnoho Pedahohichnoho Universytetu imeni K. D. Ushynskoho. Astroprint — Scientific Research Issues of South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsy: Astroprint 22, 75—84 p. [in Ukrainian].
Kovaleva K. I. (2001). Original i perevod: dva litsa odnovo. [Original and translation: two faces of one]. Moskva: Vserosiyskiy Tsentr perevodov, 98 p. [in Russian].
Kryvonos Ya. (2010). Osoblyvosti zastosuvannia stratehii ochuzhennia ta odomashnennia u suchasnomu ukrainskomu perekladi. [Features of application of strategies of alienation and domestication in modern Ukrainian in translation]. Ukrainske movoznavstvo. Mizhvidomchyi naukovyi zbirnyk — Ukrainian linguistics. Interdepartmental scientific and technical collection, 40/1, 316—318 p. [in Ukrainian].
Kyiak T. R., Ohui O. D., Naumenko A. M. (2006). Teoriia ta praktyka perekladu (nimetska mova). [Theory and practice of translation (German)]. Vinnytsia: Nova Knyha, 592 p. [in Ukrainian].
Levitskaya T. R., Fiterman A. M. (1979). Kompressiya v angliyskom yazyke i yeyo peredahca pri perevode. [Compression in English and its transmission in translation]. Tetradi perevodchika — Translator’s notebooks. Moskva, 16, 51—59 p. [in Russian].

Lukianova T. H. (2012). Osnovy anhlo–ukrainskoho kinoperekladu: navchalnyi posibnyk zadlia studentiv 4 kursu osvitnio—kvalifikatsiinoho rivnia “Bakalavr” dennoi formy navchannia fakultetu inozemnyh mov. [Fundamentals of English-Ukrainian film translation: textbook and manual for students in the 4th year of educational qualification level “Bachelor” full-time study of the Faculty of Foreign Languages]. Harkiv: Harvivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni V. N. Karazina, 104 p. [in Ukrainian].
Orero P. Topics in audiovisual translation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Pub, 2004. 227 p.
O’Sullivan C. Translating Popular Film. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 243 p.
Sdobnikov V. V., Petrova O. V. (2008). Teoriya perevoda. [Theory of Translation]. Moskva: AST: Vostok—Zapad. Vladimir: VKT, 448 p. [in Russian].
Vozna M. O. (2011). Do pytannia pro stratehiiu ta adekvatnist anhlo—ukrainskoho perekladu zaholovkiv hudozhnih filmiv. [On the question of strategy and adequacy of translation of titles from English into Ukrainian in feature films]. Fahovyi ta hudozhnii pereklad: teoria, metodolohiia, praktyka: materialy IV Mizhnarodnoi naukovo—praktychnoi konferentsii 1–2 kvitnia 2011 r. — Professional and literary translation: theory, methodology, practice: materials of the IV International scientific-practical conference on April 1–2, 2011. Kyiv. 37—41 p. [in Ukrainian].

 

Khristina Mykhailichenko
pdf

Master Student in Philology, State Institution «South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky»,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: kinda17@icloud.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–8400–1865

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2020-31-18

Key words: political linguistics, translation, discourse, language unit, political rhetoric, manipulation.

The actuality of this research is the comparative analysis of political discourse translation of Donald Trump and Barack Obama from the point of view of the application of linguistic and stylistic features of the translation political speeches of both presidents. Political discourse is a phenomenon that we face every day. Taking into account the realities of our time, the wide spread of democracy, the openness of society, more and more attention is paid to the political
language. The study of translations of the speeches of the US presidents allows, on the one hand, to predict further actions and intentions of a politician, and on the other, to highlight the most effective ways of influencing the audience. That is why the translation of political speeches is increasingly becoming an object of interest for scholars in various fields, especially in translation studies. The purpose of the proposed article is to identify the linguistic and stylistic features of the reproduction of US political discourse on the material of the speeches of the last two presidents of this country — Obama and Trump. The thematic, cultural and linguistic peculiarities of translation of the inaugural speeches of D. Trump and B. Obama are investigated.
A comparative analysis of the linguistic units used by both presidents and their Ukrainian translations revealed that the preservation of the content during translation is possible due to the restoration of all relevant components of the utterance, and the translation of lexical units, including the evaluative component, is carried out in most cases with the help of regular correspondences. It is proved that during translating political speeches, linguo-stylistic features
are actualized by combining regular correspondences and various transformations which make it possible to preserve or modify the variant characteristics of a particular linguistic unit.

REFERENCES

Vashchuk, T. (2020). Politychnyi dyskurs yak obiekt linhvistychnoho doslidzhennia [Political discourse as an object of linguistic research].URL: http: // eprints. zu.edu.ua/1720/ (access date: 05.09.2020) [in Ukrainian]
Didenko, M. O. (2001). Politychnyi vystup yak typ tekstu (na materiali vystupiv
nimetskykh politychnykh diiachiv kintsia 20 stolittia) [Political speech as a type of text (based on the speeches of German politicians of the late 20th century)]. Odessa National University named after І. Mechnikov, Odessa [in Ukrainian]
Maslova, V. A. (2008). Politicheskii diskurs iazykovye igry ili igry v slova [Political discourse: language games or word games?]. Political linguistics. Is. 1, 24. [in Russian]
Nahorna, L. P. (2005). Politychna mova i movna polityka: diapazon mozhlyvostei politychnoi linhvistyky [Political speech and language policy: political linguistics range of possibilities]. Monografh, Kyiv [in Ukrainian]
Pavlova, E. K. (2010). Politicheskii diskurs v globalnom kommunikativnom prostranstve na materiale angliiskikh i russkikh tekstov [Political discourse in the global communicative space (based on English and Russian texts) [in Russian]
Slavova, L. L.(2010). Movna osobystist polityka: kohnityvno-dyskursyvnyi aspekt [Linguistic personality of a politician: cognitive-discursive aspect]. Monograph, Zhitomir, Vydvo ZhDU im. I. Franka [in Ukrainian]
Solovei, H. S. (2011). Politychna leksyka yak obiekt perekladu (na materiali tekstiv politychnykh zaiav, zvernen, promov, statei ta anekdotiv) [Political vocabulary as an object of translation (based on the texts of political statements, appeals, speeches, articles and anecdotes)]. Kherson. state un-t. Kherson [in Ukrainian]
Fedoriv, Ya. (2010). Linhvistychni modeli dyskursu publichnykh vystupiv : narysy iz suchasnykh kulturno-movlennievykh praktyk [Linguistic models of the discourse of public speeches: essays on modern cultural and speech practices]. Kyiv, VPTs NaUKMA [in Ukrainian]
SHeigal, E. I. (2004). Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Semiotics of political discourse]. Monograph, Moscow, ITDGK Gnosis [in Russian]
Cook, G. (2001). The Discourse of Advertising. London and New York. Routledge [in English] Crystal, David (2003). The Cabridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press [in English]
Djik, T. A. van (1997). What is political discourse analysis? URL: http://www.discourses. org/OldArticles/What %20is %20Political %20Discourse %20 Analysis.pdf (access date 05.10.2020) [in English]
Mencken, H. L. (2006). The American Language. New York, Alfred A Knopf [in English] The White House Blog. URL: http://www.obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog (access
date 05.09.2020) [in English]

 

Svitlana Maslova
pdf

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor at Philology Department, Odesa National Maritime University,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: stephaniabw@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–3600–8501

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2020-31-17

Key words: essay, stylistic features, influencing function, reality, linguistic and cultural adaptation.

The choice of an essay as the object of analysis presents significant difficulties for the researcher, since even the definition of the genre in the theory of literature is still not set; there is no integral concept of the genre, the views of literary scholars on essays are extremely contradictory.

Unlike existing theoretical and practical studies on various literary genres, the essay seems to be an insufficiently studied object of analysis in the linguistic and translation perspectives, which determines the relevance of the paper.

The objective of the study is to determine the features of the translation of a publicist essay on the example of the translation of the literary work of I. Brodsky “Reflection on a Spawn of Hell” from Russian into English. To achieve this objective,
the following tasks are to be solved:
1) to identify the main stylistic features of the essay by I. Brodsky;
2) to determine the specifics of its translation into English.

The dominant function of the essay is the influencing one. It is implemented by referring to the emotional-figurative way of the addressee’s perception of the world. The stylistic features of I. Brodsky’s publicist essay, characterizing it as a resource of stylistic expressiveness, fully agree with the influencing function of the type of the text under study: syntactic constructions with inverted word order, rhetorical questions, quotations, complex sentences with a number of homogeneous members, elliptical constructions, gradation, stylistically coloured vocabulary, a
combination of stylistically reduced and colloquial vocabulary aimed at achieving maximum expressiveness.

The translator renders the stylistic features of the source text by selecting functional analogues in the target language. Difficulties arise when reproducing the cultural realities of the original linguistic culture.

The appellative type of the text, which an essay is, requires significant linguocultural adaptation of the realities of the source language to the socio-cultural background of the target language. The translation under study tends to reproduce only the outer shell of definite lexemes and phrases, which are bearers of factual information and have a significant pragmatic potential in the original text. Despite the complexity and cultural richness of the text itself, with its specific
words and conceptual system, the translator does not fully pragmatically adapt the significant elements of the source text, which affects the adequacy of its translation. In our opinion, translation errors prevent reproduction of the author’s communicative intentions in full.

We consider the prospects for further developments in the expansion of research materials in order to obtain general conclusions regarding the peculiarities of the translation of an essay as a genre and the specifics of rendering the individual author’s style in translation.

REFERENCES

D’yachenko S. N. (2012). Esse kak tip teksta: teoreticheskiy i metodologicheskiy aspekty. Kul’tura narodov Prichernomor’ya [Essay as a type of text: theoretical and methodological aspects. Culture of the peoples of the Black Sea region], 230, 155–158 [in Russian].
Epshteyn M. (1987). Zakony svobodnogo zhanra (Esseistika i esseizm v kul’ture Novogo vremeni). Voprosy literatury [Laws of the Free Genre (Essay and Essayism in the Culture of the New Age). Literature Issues], 7, 120–152 [in Russian].
Reiss, Katharina (1983) Texttyp und Übersetzungsmethode [Text Type and Translation Method]. Heidelberg: Groos, 146 S. [in German].

 

Anastasiia Lahutik
pdf

Master Student in Philology, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: lagutik1712@gmail.com
ORCID ID https: https://orcid.org/0000–0001–7944–4883

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2020-31-16

Tetiana Korolova

Doctor of Philology, Head of the Department of Translation and Theoretical and Applied
Linguistics, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named
after K. D. Ushynsky”
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: kortami863@gmail.com
ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000–3441–196Х

Key words: J. Rowling’s authorial style, stylistic means, pragmatics of the text, linguo-cultural elements, cognitive-emotional components.

The article is devoted to the study of the author’s style of Joan Rowling. The relevance of the study lies in the fact that despite the large number of studies on the analysis of the author’s style of Joan Rowling, relatively few scientific works are devoted, which determines the relevance of the study. The purpose of the study is to analyze the idiosyncrasy of Joan Rowling, the task of the study is to analyze the theoretical foundations of the concept of the author’s individual style, to consider the linguistic means of its expression. Research methods include analysis, synthesis, generalization, definition analysis, component analysis. The content of the study includes an analysis of the theoretical foundations of the concept of individual style of the author, an empirical study of the means of actualization of stylistic devices in the works of the author. The work clarifies the concept of author’s style is understood as a set of cultural and expressive means that perform an aesthetic function and distinguish the language of an individual writer among others. The analysis of the research material provided an opportunity to come to the following conclusions: the main components of the individual style of the writer are the composition of the work, theme, artistic content, temporal color,richness of the author’s language, as well as stylistic factors; An important place is given to the author’s worldview and his ability to reflect the relevant cognitive, emotional and linguistic and cultural components in language units, which are aimed at strengthening the pragmatic influence of the text on the reader. It is worth noting that the formation of the individual style of J. Rawlings is also
influenced by the era, its socio-historical conditions, and so on. The results of the study showed that culturally expressive means include a wide range. Among the most commonly used means of creating a literary text are metaphor, comparison, hyperbole, epithets, metaphorical epithets, irony, antithesis, and so on.

REFERENCES

Voskoboynikov, V. V. (2013). Aktualnyye aspekty izucheniya idiostilya v sovremennoy lingvistike. [Actual aspects of studying idiostyle in modern linguistics]. Vestnik Volgu, 9 (11),[in Russian].
Genneken, E. (1892). Opyt postroyeniya nauchnoy kritiki [Experience of building scientific criticism]. SPb.: Rus. Bogatstvo [in Russian].
Gorelov, I. N. (1998). Osnovy psikholingvistiki: uchebnoye posobiye [Fundamentals of psycholinguistics: textbook]. Moscow: Labyrinth [in Russian].
Datchenko, Yu. (2007). Mova tvoriv Mykoly Cherniavskoho [The language of Mykola
Chernyavsky`s works]. Extended abstract of candidate`s thesis. Dnipropetrovsk [in Ukrainian].
Didukh, Kh. Idiostyl yak vidobrazhennia avtorskoi kartyny svitu. Filolohichni nauky.
Rytoryka i stylistyka [Idiostyle as a reflection of the author’s picture of the world. Rhetoric and Stylistics]. Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka — Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Retrieved from http://www.rusnauka.com/15_NNM_2012/Philologia/2_111114.doc.htm [in Ukrainian].
Dovganchina, R. (2007) Idiostyl v aspekti khudozhnoho perekladu [Idiostyle in the aspect of literary translation] Philological Studios [in Ukrainian].
Yermolenko, S. S. & Bybyk, S. (2001) Ukrainska mova: korotkyi tlumachnyi slovnyk linhvistychnykh terminiv. [Ukrainian language: a short Explanatory Dictionary of linguistic terms] Moscow: Lybid publ [in Ukrainian].
Karaulov, Yu. N. (1989) Russkaya yazykovaya lichnost i zadachi eye izucheniya [Russian language personality and tasks of its study]. M.: Language and personality [in Russian].
Karelova, I. I. (2009) Natsionalnaya kontseptosfera i idiokontseptosfera (na materiale proizvedeniy L. E. Ulitskoy) [National conceptosphere and idioconceptosphere (based on the works of L. E. Ulitskaya)] Extended abstract of candidate`s thesis. Volgograd [in Russian].
Kovshikov V. A. (2007) Psikholingvistika. Teoriya rechevoy deyatelnosti [Psycholinguistics. Theory of speech activity], Moscow: AST: Astrel [in Russian].
Korolkov, V. I. (1972) Figury stilisticheskiye. Kratkaya literaturnaya entsiklopediya [Stylistic figures. Short literary encyclopedia], Moscow: Soviet Ukraine — Fliaki. STB [in Russian].
Korolova, T. M. (2015) Aktualni problemy dyskursolohii [Current issues of discourse]. Odesa: Astroprynt [in Ukrainian].

Kulishova, N. D. (2001) Yazykovaya lichnost v aspekte psikholingvisticheskikh kharakteristik (na materiale pismennykh tekstov) [Language personality in the aspect of psycholinguistic characteristics (based on written texts)]. Extended abstract of candidate`s thesis. Krasnodar: RNB [in Russian].
Literaturoznavchiy slovnik-dovidnik [Literary dictionary-reference book] (1997). K.: Akademiya [in Ukrainian].
Naumov, V. V. (2010) Lingvisticheskaya identifikatsiya lichnosti [Linguistic identification of personality]. Moscow: book House “LIBROKOM” [in Russian].
Perelomova, O. Movnyi aspekt idiostyliu Valeriia Shevchuka [Language aspect of
the Idiostyle of Valery Shevchuk]. Retrieved from http:/dspase.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/
handle/123456789/31880/32-PerelomoVA. pdf[in Ukrainian].
Ryshkevich, I. (2014) Do problemy idiostyliu avtora v khudozhnii literaturi. Aktualni problemy romano-hermanskoi filolohii [Before the problem of the author’s idiostyle in the art literature. Actual problems of Romano-German Philology]. Proceedings of the 3rd scientific-practical Seminar. Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University. Lutsk [in Ukrainian].
Slovnyk literaturnykh terminiv [Dictionary of literary terms]. Retrieved from https://onlyart. org.ua/dictionary-literary-terms/hudozhni-zasoby-zobrazhalno-vyrazhal/_ [in Ukrainian].
Stawicka, L. (2009) Pro termin idiolekt. Ukrainska mova [About termin idiolect. Ukrainian Language], (№ 4). (pp.3 –15). Kyiv: NAN of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Ukrainian language: encyclopedia (2004). Kyiv: Bazhan Ukrainian encyclopedia publishing house [in Ukrainian].
Khrapchenko, M. B. (1977) Tvorcheskaya individualnost pisatelya i razvitiye literatury. [Creative individuality of the writer and development of literature], Moscow [in Russian].
Sharkunova, O. V. (2011) Idiostil khudozhestvennogo teksta kak individualnoye sochetaniye ekstra- i intralingvisticheskikh parametrov. osnovannykh na referentnykh otnosheniyakh. V mire nauki i iskusstva: voprosy filologii. iskusstvovedeniya i kulturologii [Idiostyle of a literary text as an individual combination of extra- and intralinguistic parameters based on reference relations. In the world of science and art: questions of Philology, art history and cultural studies: collection of articles on mater]: Proceedings of theInternational Scientific and Practical Conference, (pp. 59–64), Novosibirsk: SibAK [in Russian].
Shulinova, L. (2000) Aspekty idiostylistychnoho analizu. Slovianski movy i suchasnyi svit. [Aspects of idiostylistic analysis. Slavic languages and the modern world]. Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka — Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Shchirova, I. A. (2006) Tekst v paradigmakh sovremennogo gumanitarnogo znaniya: monografiya [Text in paradigms of modern humanitarian knowledge]. St. Petersburg: Book house [in Russian].
Yankelevich, M. S. (2013) Otrazheniye lichnosti avtora v khudozhestvennom proizvedenii. [Reflection of the author’s personality in a work of art]. Psikhologiya — Psychology, 2, 162–168 [in Russian].
Rowling, J. K. (1999) Harri Potter ta viazen Azkabanu [Harry Potter and the prisoner
of Azkaban]. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.passuneb.com/elibrary/ebooks/HARRY %20POTTER %20AND %20THE %20PRISONER %20OF %20 AZKABAN. pdf [in English].
Sait fаn klubu «Dzhoan Rouling» [Site of fun club «Rowling, J. K»]. fantlab.ru Retrieved from https://fantlab.ru/autor131 [in Russian].

 

Kseniia Kuli-Ivanchenko
pdf

Master Student in Philology, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: sunny3k@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–8852–5869

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2020-31-15

Olena Velychenko

Candidate of Philology, Lecturer at the Department of Translation and Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: lepinapelina@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–8349–5621

Key words: ethnopsycholinguistics, sociopsycholinguistics, ethnopsycholinguistic stereotypes, cross-cultural aspect of translation, strategies, tactics, translation operations.

The article is devoted to the problem of interdisciplinary nature, relevant for both ethno- and socio-psycholinguistics and translation studies due to the need for deeper study of the problem of reflection and correct rendering of national, cultural and linguistic features and characteristics in English translation into Ukrainian and vice versa. The study describes the features of language stereotypes in English-speaking culture in reproduction in Ukrainian translation, reveals the specifics of the phenomenon of communicative conflict and its reflection in translation, identifies a set of leading tactics and dominant translation operations in implementing a strategy of communicative-equivalent translation that is used to achieve optimal faithfulness and correctness in the studied pair of languages within ethnopsychospecific cross-cultural communication. Based on the results of the analysis of the peculiarities of language behavior in the situation of communicative conflict, a typology of ethnopsycholinguistic stereotypes has been developed. The article also provides a classification of levels of communicative competence, which is based on the ability of the language personality to cooperate in interpersonal communication. The results of the research can be useful in solving modern problems of intercultural communication in translation studies and serve as a powerful tool for optimizing translation, taking into account crosscultural differences in the English — Ukrainian language pair.

REFERENCES

Bakhtin, M. M. (2000). Freidizm. Formalnyi metod v literaturovedenii. Marksizm i filosofiia iazyka. Stati [Freudianism. The formal method in literary studies. Marxism and philosophy of language. Articles]. Moskva: Labirint [in Russian].
Berne, E. (2016). Igry v kotorye igraiut liudi. Psikhologiia chelovecheskikh otnoshenii [Games People Play. The Psychology of Human Relationships]. Nyköping, Sweden: Philosophical arkiv [in Russian].
Gorelov, I. N., & Sedov, K. F. (2001). Osnovy psikholingvistiki [Fundamentals of Psycholinguistics]. Moskva: Labirint [in Russian].
Dementev, V. V. (2000). Nepriamaia kommunikatsiia i ee zhanry [Indirect communication and its genres]. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta [in Russian].
Dementev, V. V., & Sedov, K. F. (1999). Teoriia rechevykh zhanrov: sotsiopragmaticheskii aspekt [Speech genre theory: sociopragmatic aspect]. Stylistyka – Stylistics, VIII, 53–87 [in Russian].
Sedov, K. F. (1996). Tipy iazykovykh lichnostei i strategii rechevogo povedeniia (o ritorike bytovogo konflikta) [Types of linguistic personalities and strategies of speech behavior (on the rhetoric of everyday conflict)]. Voprosy stilistiki. Iazyk i chelovek — Stylistics issues. Language and human, 26, 8–14 [in Russian].
Fox, K. (2018). Sposterihaiuchy za anhliitsiamy [Watching the English]. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Staroho Leva [in Ukrainian].
Bradford, B. (1988). Intonation in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
Flick, U. (1995). Social representations. Rethinking Psychology. London [in English].
Fox, K. (2014). Watching the English. The Hidden Rules of English Behaviour. London: Hodder & Stoughton [in English].
Harre, R. (1995). Discursive psychology. Rethinking Psychology. London [in English].

 

Victoria Kovalchuk
pdf

Master Student in Philology, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: beamlighttt@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–8665–1028

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2020-31-14

Vladyslava Akkurt

Candidate of Philology, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Translation and Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: Akkurt.VY@pdpu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0003–3542–3428

Key words: psycholinguistics,

persuasion strategy, beauty industry, translation strategies, tactics, devices.

The article is dedicated to the problem of the interdisciplinary character which is also urgent for psycholinguistics and translation studies. In the focus of the analysis there are linguistic means of representing persuasion strategy in English advertising texts in beauty-industry and the key translation strategies, tactics and devices. It has been concluded that the dominant ones are the strategy of re-addressing and of tertiary translation, while the most widely occurred tactics are the tactic of rendering relevant information, the tactic correct presentation and the tactic of linguistic and cultural adaptation. The analysis of the translation devices has revealed the predominance of such simple devices as transplantation, transcoding, different types of replacements (contextual replacement, concretization, functional replacement). On the level of complex translation transformations there has been resumed that the most widely used are descriptive translation, antonymous translation and the technique of semantic development. The research is perspective and its findings may be employed as a means of translation optimization in the field of beauty industry.

REFERENCES

Baranov, A. N. (1990). Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentatsyii (kognitivnyi podkhod).
[Linguistic theory of argumentation (cognitive approach)]. Moscow [in Russian].
Gorelov, I. N., Sedov K. F. (2001). Osnovy psikholingvistiki. [Fundamentals of psycholinguistics]. Moscow [in Russian].
Dementyev, V. V. (2000). Nepryamaya kommunikatsiya i yeye zhanry [Indirect Communication and its Genres]. Saratov [in Russian].
Dementyev, V. V., Sedov K. F. (1999). Teoriya rechevykh zhanrov: sotsiopragmaticheskiy aspekt [Theory of Speech Genres: Sociopragmatic Aspect]. Stylistyka VIII. Opole [in Russian].
Zernetskii, V. P. (1988). Lingvisticheskiye aspekty teorii rechevoi deyatel’nosti [Linguistic aspects of speech activity theory]. Kalinin [in Russian].
Sedov, K. F. (1996). Tipy yazykovykh lichnostey i strategii rechevogo povedeniya (o ritorike bytovogo konflikta) [Types of Linguistic Personalities and Strategies of Speech Behavior (about Rhetoric of Everyday Conflict)]. Voprosy stilistiki. Yazyk i chelovek. Matters of Stylistics. A Language and a Human. Issue 26. Saratov [in Russian].
Sternin, I. А. (2012). Osnovy rechevogo vozdeistviia [Fundamentals of speech influence].  Voronezh [in Russian].
Larson, Ch. U. (1995). Persuasion: reception and responsibility. Belmont [in English].

 

Alexander Iliadi
pdf

Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of Methods of Preschool and Primary Education at Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine
e-mail: alexandr.iliadi@gmail.com
ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000–0001–5078–8316

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2020-31-13

Key words: etymology, reconstruction, derivative, mythonym, demonology.

The paper deals with the etymological analysis of the name of mythological character Царь Хан, from the text of a Ukrainian spell for snake bites. A number of signs encourages to think about, that we deal with the result of division and rethinking of the etymological form *Кантысар, the trace of which is found out in archaic Ukrainian vocabulary of burial ritual. Particularly, here the Lord of Graves, which charges payment with dead for a place under the ground, is mentioned.
Further search of the etymological source of this word takes us up to the conclusion about reflection of Alanian *Kanti Sar «Lord of Graves» or «Lord of the Underworld» in the *Кантысар. With taking into account of word context and associated semiotics we can figure out in general terms semantics of character of the *Кантысар and place him on a par with other figures of Slavic demonology, also borrowed from the Iranian source. The adaptation of the stranger mythological figure to the charactersʼ system of Slavic mythology was possible due
to functional affinity the *Кантысар to indigenous chthonic personages, identified with the *Кантысар. 

Сoncomitantly with etymology of the name Кантысар the genesis of an Ukrainian demonic name довгомýд ʻhalf-beast and half-manʼ is defined (< Alanian *dewaga-mand, *dewga-mand ʻobsessed with a daemonʼ).

REFERENCES

Abaev V. I. (1958–1989). Istoriko-ètimologicheskiy slovarʼ osetinskogo âzyka [Historic-Etymological Dictionary of Ossetian Language]. Мoscow ; Leningrad : Izd-vo AN SSSR ; Nauka. Т. I–IV [in Russian].
Abaev V. I. (1990). Skifskiy byt i reforma Zoroastra [Scythian life and the reform of Zoroaster].
Abaev V. I. Izbrannye trudy. Religia. Folʼklor. Literatura — Abaev V. I. Selected Works.
Religion. Folklore. Literature. Vladikavkaz : Ir, 9–51 [in Russian].
Abdullaev E. V. (2013). Zoroastriana-Slavica: o dvukh vostochnolslavʼanskikh parallelʼakh avestiyskomu Videvdatu [Zoroastriana-Slavica: about two Eastern Slavic parallels to Avestan Videvdat]. Commentationes Iranicae: Sbornik statey k 90-letiû Vladimira Aronovicha Livshitsa — Commentationes Iranicae: Collection of articles on the 90th anniversary of Vladimir Aronovich Livshits. S.-Peterburg : Nestor-Istoria, 661–667 [in Russian].
Dalʼ V. I. (1879). Poslovitsy russkogo naroda [Proverbs of the Russian people]. S.-Peterburg ; M. : Izd-vo M. O. Volʼfa, T. I [in Russian].
Dalʼ V. I. (2006). Tolkovy slovarʼ zhivogo velikorusskogo âzyka [Thesaurus of Russian
Language]. Moscow : RIPOL klassik. T. 4: R–Â [in Russian].
Dzitstsoity Û. A. (1992). Narty i ikh sosedi: Geograficheskie i ètnicheskie nazvania v nartovskom èpose [Nartas and their neighbors: Geographical and Ethnical names in Nartʼs epos]. Vladikavkaz : Alania [in Russian].
Êfimenko P. (1874). Sbornik malorossiyskikh zaklinaniy [The Collection of Malorossiya spells]. Moscow : Universitetskaya tipografia [in Russian].
Iliadi A. I. (2013). K ètimologii i rekonstruktsii gruppy praslavianskikh adjektivov, proizvodnykh ot somaticheskikh terminov [To the etymology and reconstruction of Proto-Slavic adjectives group, derived from somatic terms]. Slovjansʼki obriyi — Slavonic horizons, Vol. 5, 39–44 [in Russian].
Kʼurshunova I. A. (2010). Slovarʼ nekalendarnykh lichnykh imen, prozvishch i familʼnykh prozvaniy Severo-Zapadnoy Rusi XV–XVII vv. [The Dictionary of calendar personal names of north-western Rus XV–XVII centuries]. S.-Peterburg : Dmitriy Bulanin [in Russian].
Onezhskie byliny, sobrannye A. F. Gilʼferdingom (1894). [Onega Epics]. Sbornik Otdelenia russkogo âzyka i slovesnosti Imperatorskoy akademii nauk — Collection of the Department of Russian languages and literature of the Imperial Academy of Sciences, Vol. 59. S.-Peterburg : Tipogr. Imperatorskoy AN [in Russian].
Rastorgueva V. S., Èdelʼman D. I. (2003) Ètimologicheskiy slovarʼ iranskikh âzykov [Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Languages]. Moscow : Vostochnaya literatura. T. 2 [in Russian].
Slovarʼ ukrayinsʼkoyi movy (1907). [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language]. Kiev. T. 1 [in Ukrainian].
Tolstaya S. M. (2012). Chet–Nechet [Odds and Evens]. Slavʼanskie drevnosti: Ètnolingvisticheskiy slovarʼ — Slavic Antiquities: Ethno-Linguistic dictionary. Moscow : Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. T. 5, 537–541 [in Russian].

Abaev V. I. (1958–1989). Istoriko-ètimologicheskiy slovarʼ osetinskogo âzyka [Historic-Etymological Dictionary of Ossetian Language]. Мoscow ; Leningrad : Izd-vo AN SSSR ; Nauka. Т. I–IV [in Russian].
Abaev V. I. (1990). Skifskiy byt i reforma Zoroastra [Scythian life and the reform of Zoroaster].
Abaev V. I. Izbrannye trudy. Religia. Folʼklor. Literatura — Abaev V. I. Selected Works.
Religion. Folklore. Literature. Vladikavkaz : Ir, 9–51 [in Russian].
Abdullaev E. V. (2013). Zoroastriana-Slavica: o dvukh vostochnolslavʼanskikh parallelʼakh avestiyskomu Videvdatu [Zoroastriana-Slavica: about two Eastern Slavic parallels to Avestan Videvdat]. Commentationes Iranicae: Sbornik statey k 90-letiû Vladimira Aronovicha Livshitsa — Commentationes Iranicae: Collection of articles on the 90th anniversary of Vladimir Aronovich
Livshits. S.-Peterburg : Nestor-Istoria, 661–667 [in Russian].
Dalʼ V. I. (1879). Poslovitsy russkogo naroda [Proverbs of the Russian people]. S.-Peterburg ; M. : Izd-vo M. O. Volʼfa, T. I [in Russian].
Dalʼ V. I. (2006). Tolkovy slovarʼ zhivogo velikorusskogo âzyka [Thesaurus of Russian
Language]. Moscow : RIPOL klassik. T. 4: R–Â [in Russian].
Dzitstsoity Û. A. (1992). Narty i ikh sosedi: Geograficheskie i ètnicheskie nazvania v nartovskom èpose [Nartas and their neighbors: Geographical and Ethnical names in Nartʼs epos]. Vladikavkaz : Alania [in Russian].
Êfimenko P. (1874). Sbornik malorossiyskikh zaklinaniy [The Collection of Malorossiya spells]. Moscow : Universitetskaya tipografia [in Russian].
Iliadi A. I. (2013). K ètimologii i rekonstruktsii gruppy praslavianskikh adjektivov, proizvodnykh ot somaticheskikh terminov [To the etymology and reconstruction of Proto-Slavic adjectives group, derived from somatic terms]. Slovjansʼki obriyi — Slavonic horizons, Vol. 5, 39–44 [in Russian].
Kʼurshunova I. A. (2010). Slovarʼ nekalendarnykh lichnykh imen, prozvishch i familʼnykh prozvaniy Severo-Zapadnoy Rusi XV–XVII vv. [The Dictionary of calendar personal names of north-western Rus XV–XVII centuries]. S.-Peterburg : Dmitriy Bulanin [in Russian].
Onezhskie byliny, sobrannye A. F. Gilʼferdingom (1894). [Onega Epics]. Sbornik Otdelenia russkogo âzyka i slovesnosti Imperatorskoy akademii nauk — Collection of the Department of Russian languages and literature of the Imperial Academy of Sciences, Vol. 59. S.-Peterburg : Tipogr. Imperatorskoy AN [in Russian].
Rastorgueva V. S., Èdelʼman D. I. (2003) Ètimologicheskiy slovarʼ iranskikh âzykov [Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Languages]. Moscow : Vostochnaya literatura. T. 2 [in Russian].
Slovarʼ ukrayinsʼkoyi movy (1907). [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language]. Kiev. T. 1 [in Ukrainian].
Tolstaya S. M. (2012). Chet–Nechet [Odds and Evens]. Slavʼanskie drevnosti: Ètnolingvisticheskiy slovarʼ — Slavic Antiquities: Ethno-Linguistic dictionary. Moscow : Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. T. 5, 537–541 [in Russian].

Mykola Zymomrya
pdf

Doctor of Philology, Professor, academician of the Academy of Sciences of the Higher School of Ukraine, Head of the Department of Germanic Languages and Translation Studies, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Honored Worker of Science
and Technology of Ukraine
e-mail: translationw2016@meta.ua
ORCID: 0000–0002–7372–4929

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2020-31-12

Nataliia Naumenko

Doctor of Philology, Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages for Professional Referrals, National University of Food Technologies (Kyiv),
Member of National Writers’ Union of Ukraine
ORCID: 0000–0002–7340–8985

Key words: the 20thcentury Ukrainian literature, prose, poetry, dramaturgy, criticism, emigration, Socialistic realism.

This article represents an analysis of the specifications of elucidating Ukrainian literary process in the first and second thirds of the 20th century, as shown by Professor Yuriy Kovaliv in his “History of Ukrainian Literature. The end of the 19th — the beginning of the 21st century” (sixth and seventh volumes out of 10 volumes planned). The significant textual material in Yu. Kovaliv’s interpretation may become not only a subject to diversely study at philological high schools, but also a powerful factor of scientific enquiries. Since being examined under nontrivial
angle and thereinafter described by precise academic language without any overusing of terms, it can serve a base to further researches of Ukrainian literature in the trend of fulfillment of so-called “whitespots” that were so peculiar for the period chosen.

REFERENCES

Zymomria M. I., & Naumenko N. V. (2016). Pidteksty na tli literaturnoho protsesu [Subtext against the background of the literary process.] Naukovi zapysky Ternopilskoho NPU imeni V. Hnatiuka. Seriia: Literaturoznavstvo — Scientific notes of the Ternopil’ National Pedagogical University. Series: Literary Studies. M. P. Tkachuk (Ed.). Ternopil’: TNPU [in Ukrainian].
Zymomria M. I., & Naumenko N. V. (2014). Sutnist modernizmu: sproba okreslennia linii yevropeiskoi literatury porubizhia stolit. [The essence of modernism: an attempt to outline the lines of European literature at the turn of the century.] Naukovi zapysky Ternopilskoho NPU imeni V. Hnatiuka. Seriia: Literaturoznavstvo — Scientific notes of the Ternopil’ National Pedagogical University. Series: Literary Studies. M. P. Tkachuk (Ed.). Ternopil’: TNPU [in Ukrainian].
Zymomria M. I. (2014). Rehuliatyvnyi znak stratehii. Naumenko Nataliia. Komu ne mriialos’, scho ye neznana Muza…: literaturno-krytychni statti [Regulatory sign of the strategy.
Naumenko Natalia. Who haven’t dreamt that there is an unknown Muse...: literary critical articles]. Kyiv: Stal’ [in Ukrainian].
Kovaliv Yu.I. (2018). Dnipropetrovski kolizii romanu “Sobor” Olesia Honchara na tli dehumanizatsii. [Dnipropetrovs’k collisions of the novel “Cathedral” by Oles’ Gonchar against the background of dehumanization]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ Poltavskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni V. H. Korolenka — Collection of scientific works of the Poltava State Pedagogical University, 1, 105–109 [in Ukrainian].
Kovaliv Yu.I. (2019). Ivan Kocherha: “Maistry chasu” [Ivan Kocherga: Masters of time».]
https://fantlab.ru Retrieved from https://fantlab.ru/user64490/blog/tag/Ivan %20Kocherha [in Ukrainian].
Kovaliv Yu.I. (2018). Kost’ Herasymenko [Kost’ Herasymenko]. Slovo i Chas — Word and time, 5, 64–65 [in Ukrainian].
Kovaliv Yu.I. (2004). “Praz’ka shkol”: na krutoskhylakh vid “filosofii sertsia” do “filosofii chynu” [“Prague School”: on steep slopes from “philosophy of the heart” to “philosophy of rank”]. Kyiv: Biblioteka ukraintsia [in Ukrainian].
Naumenko N. V. (2010). Serpantynni dorohy poezii: pryroda ta tendentsii rozvytku
ukrainskoho verlibru: monohrafiia [Serpentine roads of poetry: nature and trends in the development of the Ukrainian free verse: monograph]. Kyiv: Stal’ [in Ukrainian].
Semeniuk H. F., Huliak A. B. & Naumenko N. V. (2015). Literaturna maisternist’ pysmennyka: pidruchnyk [Literary skills of a writer: textbook]. Kyiv: Stal’ [in Ukrainian].
Yak bude vyhliadaty nasha planeta cherez 250 milioniv rokiv. [What will our planet look like in 250 million years]. (n.d.). https://www.imena.ua Retrieved from https://www.imena.ua/blog/our-planet-in-250-million-years/ [in Ukrainian].
Radyshevskiy R., & Zymomria M. I. (Eds.). (2010). Literatura. Sotsium. Epokha: yuvileinyi zbirnyk na poshanu doktora filoloihchnykh nauk, profesora Oleksandra Astafieva [Literature. Society. Epoch: Anniversary Collection in honor of Doctor of philology, Professor Alexander Astafyev]. Kyiv — Drohobych: Posvit [in Ukrainian].

 

Yulia Voloshchuk
pdf

Master Student in Philology, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: govol@meta.ua
ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000–0003–0938–4349

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2020-31-11

Natalya Zhmayeva

Candidate in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of Translation and Theoretical
and Applied Linguistics, State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University
named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: zhmaeva@gmail.com
ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000–0003–3382–0155

Key words: journalistic style, media discourse, English-language news text, news discourse, OSCE, adequate translation of news texts, translation transformations.

The relevance of the research is based on the need for an in-depth study of effective ways, techniques and methods of translating English-language news texts into Ukrainian, in particular news texts of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), which is due not only to Ukraine’s membership in the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, but also to globalization and the intensive development of international relations, which in turn affect the increasing interest of modern Ukrainian readers in foreign news texts. In addition, the relevance of the topic is due to the increased attention of linguists to modern media discourse, which also includes news discourse, and the peculiarities of its translation. The aim of the work is to analyze the specifics of translating English-language news texts into Ukrainian based on the material of OSCE news texts. To achieve this goal, the following research methods were used: comparative and comparable methods for determining the features and problems of translating English-language news texts into Ukrainian; the method of systematization and the method of complex translation analysis for analyzing and systematizing the tools used in translating English-language news texts into Ukrainian, and also using the continuous sampling method to search for basic research materials. As a result of a comparative analysis of the original English-language news texts with their translations into Ukrainian, the regularities of applying specific translation strategy, as well as the corresponding translation transformations that are necessary to achieve an adequate translation of the English-language news text were determined. The study also analyzed the problem of finding an equivalent when translating news texts.

REFERENCES

Arutyunova N. D. (1990). Diskurs: lingvisticheskij enciklopedicheskij slovar’ [Discourse: Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Sovetskaya enciklopediya [in Russian].
Duskaeva L. R. (2008) Principy tipologii gazetnyh rechevyh zhanrov [Principles of typology of newspaper speech genres]. In G. YA. Solganik (Ed.), Yazyk sovremennoj publicistiki: sb. statej (3-e izdanie) [The language of modern journalism: collection of articles (3rd edition)]. (p.128, p.131). Moscow: Flinta: Nauka [in Russian].
Latyshev L. K. (1983). Problema ekvivalentnosti v perevode [The problem of equivalence in translation]. (Doctor’s thesis). Moscow [in Russian].
Mikoyan A. S. (2008). Problemy perevoda tekstov SMI [Problems in Translating Media Texts]. Retrieved from http://evartist.narod.ru/text12/12.htm [in Russian].
Pantina O. A. (2018). Ekspressivnaya perspektiva angloyazychnogo novostnogo diskursa: na materiale gazetnyh tekstov o prirodnih katastrofah [An expressive perspective of Englishlanguage news discourse: based on newspaper texts about natural disasters]. (Doctor’s thesis). Saint Petersburg [in Russian].