Author: support

---

Yuliia I. Krasnikova

Post-Graduate Student at the Department of Ukrainian Language
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University,
Kyiv, Ukraine
e-mail: yuliiakrasnikova@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/ /0009-0009-8645-0419

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.8

---

SUMMARY

The article is dedicated to the study of the structural and semantic characteristics of headlines in contemporary diaspora press reportages over the last decade on the base the newspaper «The New Pathway Ukrainian News» (Toronto, Canada). The results of the analysis indicate that the most frequent type of headline is the traditional short headline which is typical for mass media. The newspaper’s authors use extended nominative single-clause sentences for paying readers' attention to the key aspects of the Ukrainian life abroad or events in Ukraine. Two-clause uncomplex headlines are productive because of their conciseness and clarity. According to the research the main types of question-based headlines are summarized which help establish an emotional connection with the topic of the reportage. Asyndetic constructions are the most commonly used among complex sentences in diaspora reportage’s headlines. The study also identified headlines which consists of two or even three sentences, however such lengthy headlines could lead to misunderstanding of the text or disinterest of it. There are other syntactic types of headlines: verbal single-clause, infinitive, exclamatory, imperative, incomplete, parcelled structures, incomplete sentences, quotes, and phraseological units. This study is designed as a foundation for further linguistic research into the issue of Ukrainian-language diaspora reportage, their structure, genre and semantic content.

---

Key words: diaspora, mass media, reportage, headline, singleclause sentence, two-clause sentence, complex sentence, incomplete sentence, interrogative sentences, exclamation sentence, direct address, direct speech, phraseological units.

---

REFERENCES

Bagan M. (2012). Zaperechennia u zagolovkakh suchasnykh ZMI [Negation in the Headlines of Modern Media]. Kul’tura slova [Culture of the Word]. Vol. 77, pp. 153–157.
Vintoniv M. O., Vintoniv T. M., Mala Yu. V. (2018). Syntaksychni zasoby ekspresyvizacii v ukrayins’komu politychnomu dyskursi [Syntactic means of expressvization in Ukrainian Political Discourse]. Vinnycia: Tvory.

Zagnitko A. P. (1996). Ukrayins’ky syntaksys [Ukrainian Syntax]. Kyiv: IZMN. Part 1.
Zagnitko A. P. (2009). Ukrayins’ky syntaksys: teoretyko-prykladny aspect [Ukrainian Syntax: Theoretic and Applied Aspects]. Doneck: DonNU.
Zdorovega V. J. (2004). Teoriya i metodyka zhurnalists’koyi tvorchosti [Theory and Methods of Journalistic Work]. Lviv: PAIS.
Ivanov V. F. (2000). Tekhnika oformlennia gazety [Technique of Newspaper Design]. Kyiv: Znannia.
Kul’turno-gumanitarna vzayemodiya. Posol’stvo Ukrayiny v Kanadi [Cultural-Humanitarian Collaboration. Ukraine’s Embassy in Canada]. URL: https://canada.mfa.gov.ua/spivrobitnictvo/kulturno-gumanitarna-vzayemodiya (23.10.2024).
Marinenko I., Mykhailenko V. (2020). Gramatychna struktura zagolovka suchasnykh ukrayins’kykh media [Grammatical Structure of Headline in Modern Ukrainian Media]. Naukovi zapysky.Seriya: Filologichni nauky [ Scientific Bulletin. Series: Philological Sciences]. Vol. 187, pp. 367–375.
Novyi Shlakh – Ukrayins’ki visti [New Way – Ukrainian News]. URL: https://newpathway.ca/
Pavl’uk L. S. (2010). Zagolovok u dyskursi mas-media: semantyko-zmistovi rysy i funkcional’no-structurni typy [Headline in the Discourse of Media: Semantic-Meaningful Features and Functional-Structural Types]. Tele- ta radiozhurnalistyka [Television Journalism and Radio Journalism]. Vol. 9. Part 2, pp. 285–293.
Predstavl’ayemo nashe nove vydannia. Novyi shlakh – Ukrayins’ki visti [Presenting Our New Edition. New Way – Ukrainian News]. 05.09.2017. URL: https://newpathway.ca/predstavliaemo-nashe-nove-vydannia/ (23.10.2024).
Topchyi L. M. (2021). Funkcional’ni osoblyvosti parcel’ovanykh zagolovkiv [Functional Features of Parcellated Headlines]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernads’kogo. Seriya: Filologiya. Zhurnalistyka [Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philology. Journalism]. T. 32 (71). № 6. Part 1, pp. 53–57.

---

Tetiana V. Hromko

Doctor of Philology, Professor at the Department of English Philology
and Translation
Odessa Polytechnic National University,
Odessa, Ukraine
e-mail: hromkot@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4661-4302

Olena M. Mitina

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department
of English Philology and Translation
Odessa Polytechnic National University,
Odessa, Ukraine
e-mail: olenamitina@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0442-6837

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.7

---

SUMMARY

The article explores linguistic variation as an important aspect of modern sociolinguistics, in particular through the prism of the song «Let's Call the Whole Thing Off» by the Gershwin brothers. The authors point out that language differences not only identify a speaker or a social group, but also reflect cultural and social tensions. The article emphasizes the importance of perceiving these variations as a source of understanding rather than disagreement. An analysis of the phonetic and prosodic differences in the lyrics demonstrates how differences in word pronunciation can serve as a basis for mutual enrichment and communication. In addition, the article analyzes the cultural aspects of linguistic variation, pointing out that accents not only reflect linguistic diversity but also indicate the existence of cultural and social boundaries. Particular attention is paid to the issue of tolerance to linguistic diversity, as at the end of the song the characters decide «Let's call the whole thing off», which symbolizes acceptance and compromise. The article emphasizes that linguistic differences can be perceived with humor and tolerance, serving as a tool for cultural exchange. The study of patterns of linguistic variation emphasizes their dynamic nature, which is determined by social, cultural and historical factors. Patterns manifested in phonetic variations can vary depending on geographic location, social groups, and cultural influences. According to scientists, such patterns are not static but are subject to change under the influence of language mobility and globalization. They are becoming markers of social identity and cultural heritage, while serving to unite rather than divide. The authors of the article point out that the determination and stratification of language variants deepen the understanding of linguistic variation in the context of social structures. Researchers such as Basil Bernstein and Joshua Fishman emphasize that language patterns reflect cultural and ethnic identities, determining how social practices shape linguistic behavior. In this context, the article not only illustrates how linguistic variations can serve as a source of communication, but also emphasizes the importance of tolerance in today's globalized society, where diversity is a value rather than an obstacle to understanding.

---

Key words: sociolinguistics, communication, language variation, tolerance, linguistic patterns, phonetic differences, cultural identity, linguo-cultural features.

---

REFERENCES

Anderson L. (1986). Language Is a Virus. New York: Warner Bros. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eTSL2kopP4.
Bernstein B. (1971). Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cameron D. (1995). Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.
Cheshire J. (1982). Language in Society: The Sociolinguistics of Early Adolescents. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cruttenden A. (2014). Gimson's Pronunciation of English. London: Routledge. Eckert P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.
Fasold R. (1984). The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fishman J. (1989). Language and Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guthrie W. (1944). This Land Is Your Land. New York: Folkways Records. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlaqPRCuRhU.
Holmes J. (1992). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
Labov W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lev-Ari Sh., & Keysar B. (2010). «Why Don’t We Believe Non-native Speakers? The Influence of Accent on Credibility». Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 1093–1096.
Milroy L, Milroy J. (2012). Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. London: Routledge.
Sting (1987). Englishman in New York. New York: A&M Records. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d27gTrPPAyk.
Trudgill P. (1990). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wells J. C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

---

Natalia G. Arefieva

Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor at the Department of Social Sciences
Odessa National Medical University;
Professor at the Department of Applied Linguistics
Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University,
Odesa, Ukraine
e-mail: n.arefieva@onu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4974-9157

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.6

---

SUMMARY

The article is devoted to phraseology – one of the most mysterious, imaginative and, at the same time, most informative language system, which is able to reflect the categories of culture, that led to the purpose of this investigation: to demonstrate stereotypes, standards, precedent phenomena, symbols, archetypes, linguocultural codes, linguocultural code spaces in phraseological units as language facts, that were created and presented in culture. The objects of the study are phraseological units of some Slavic languages, national and regional ones. The subjects are the categories of culture, which they mirror. The theoretical and practical value consists in attracting attention of scientists to further linguocultural, ethnolinguistic, linguosemiotic, social linguistic researches based on phraseology of different languages, as well as in the possibility of using of the obtained results in studies of linguoculturology, ethnolinguistics, linguosemiotics, social linguistics, intercultural communication, phraseology, translation studies. Based on the given data, the author concludes: phraseological units as the language signs that have been created and established in culture, reflect ancient archetypical ideas, imprint deep cultural meanings, acting as cultural signs and functioning as symbols, stereotypes, standards etc.

---

Key words: phraseology, categories of culture, phraseological picture of the world, concept, stereotype, standard, precedent phenomenon, symbol, archetype, linguocultural code, linguocultural code space.

---

REFERENCES

Aref’eva N. G. (2021). Frazeolohiia rosiiskykh pereselenskykh hovirok Pivdnia Ukrainy: linhvokulturolohichnyi ta leksykohrafichnyi aspekty [Phraseology of Russiam Migrant Dialects of the South of Ukraine: Linguocultural and Lexicographic aspects]. Doctor’s thesis. Dnipro [in Ukrainian].
Aref’eva N. G. (2023). Astronomichnyi linhvokulturnyi kod u bolharskii frazeolohii (kontsept «nebo») [Astronomical Linguocultural Code in Bulgarian Phraseology]. Naukovyi visnyk PNPU im. K. D. Ushynskoho: Linhvistychni nauky. № 37, pp. 18–33 [in Ukrainian].
Azhniuk B. D. (1989). Anhliiska frazeolohiia u kulturno-etnichnomu vysvitlenni [English Phraseology in Cultural and Ethnic Delighting]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Bartmiński J. (2020). Frazeologia a językowy obraz świata. Słowiańska Frazeologia Gwarowa II: monografia zbiorowa / [pod red. Macieja Raka i Valerija M. Mokienki]. Kraków: Uniwersytet Yagielloński, Wydział Polonistyki. Ksiegarnia Akademicka, s. 53–62 [in Polish].
BPP: Stoikova S. (2007). Bъlharsky poslovytsy y pohovorky [Bulgarian Proverbs and Sayings]. Sofyia: Kolybry [in Bulgarian].
FRBE: Frazeologichen rechnik na bъlgarskiya yezik (1974–1975). [Phraseological Dictionary of Bulgarian Languge]. Sofia: BAN. Vol. 1–2 [in Bulgarian].
FSRGO: Aref’eva N. G. (2020). Frazeologіchnii slovnik rosіiskikh govіrok Odeshchini [Phraseological Dictionary of Russian dialects of Odessa region]. Odesa: Odeskii natsіonalnii unіversitet іmenі І. І. Mechnikova.
FSSSHD: Uzhchenko V. D., Uzhchenko D. V. (2013). Frazeolohіchnyi slovnyk shіdnoslobozhans’kyh і stepovyh hovіrok Donbasu [Phraseological Dictionary of Eastern Slobozhanshchina and Steppe Dialects of Donbas]. Lugans’k, Lugans’k Taras Shevchenko National University [in Ukrainian].
Ionova Y. A. (2009). Kontsept «halushky» v kartyni svitu ukrayintsiv i yoho estetychna aktualizatsiia v poetytsi M. V. Hoholia [Concept “halushki” in the World Image of Ukrainians and his aesthetic activization in Gogol’s poetics]. Mova. № 14, pp. 57–63.
Kovshova M. L. (2016). Linguocultural Method in Phraseology: Codes of Culture. Edition 3. URL: http://www.tnu.in.ua/study/books/entry-1418345.html.
Levchenko O. P. (2005). Frazeologichna symvolika: lingvokul’turologichny aspekt [Phraseological Symbolism: Linguoculturological Aspect]. Lviv: LRIDU NADU [in Ukrainian].
Maslova V. A. (2001). Linguoculturology: manual for students of higher educational institutions. Academy. URL: https://studfile.net/preview/1713497/page:14/
Mokienko V. M. (2020). Dialect and Historical Phraseology. Prospects of interaction. Słowiańska Frazeologia Gwarowa II: monografia zbiorowa / [pod red. Macieja Raka i Valerija M. Mokienki]. Kraków: Uniwersytet Yagielloński, Wydział Polonistyki. Ksiegarnia Akademicka, s. 83–91.
Savchenko L. V. (2013). Fenomen etnokodiv dukhovnoi kul’tury u frazeologii ukrains’koi movy: etymologichny ta etnolingvistychny aspekty [Phenomenon of Ethnocodes of Spiritual Culture and Phraseology of Ukrainian Language: Etymological and Ethnolinguistic Aspects]. Simferopil’: Dol’a [in Ukrainian].
SFUM: Slovnyk frazeologizmiv ukrains’koi movy (2003). [Dictionary of Ukrainian Phraseological Units] / [comp. V. M. Bilonozhenko etc.]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
SSNP: Slovnik stіikikh narodnikh porіvnyan (1993) [Dictionary of stable folk comparisons] / [O. S. Yurchenko, A. O. Іvchenko]. Kharkіv: Osnova [in Ukrainian].
Venzhynovych N. F. (2018). Frazemika ukrainskoi literaturnoi movy: kohnityvnyi ta linhvokulturolohichnyi aspekty [Phrases of the Ukrainian Literary Language: Cognitive and Linguistic Culturological Aspects]. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

---

Tetiana Yu. Moroz

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages
Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University,
Kharkiv, Ukraine
e-mail: t.moroz0904@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6153-8136

Svitlana S. Mykytiuk

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages
Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University,
Kharkiv, Ukraine
e-mail: svetasackura@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7264-0264

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.5

---

SUMMARY

In today’s globalized and digital society, modern communication combines various aspects within a single multimodal landscape. Foreign language teaching should consider these peculiarities to reflect real-world communication, promote purposeful language learning, accommodate a variety of learning styles, and make language acquisition more interesting and efficient. The article aims to investigate and determine successful multimodal teaching approaches and strategies that educators may use to improve foreign language teaching. For this purpose, important theoretical frameworks in language teaching that facilitate multimodal learning are studied. The potential of utilizing several multimodal activities from multimodal text analysis, educational videos, projects using collaboration or blogging, digital storytelling, multimedia (research) presentations, role-playing and drama, іnteractive museum projects/interactive career guidance quest-tour, multimodal vocabulary journals, interactive learning modules to online learning platforms and interactive textbooks is described. It is concluded that multimodal techniques are effective when they encourage learners to connect actively with the language in meaningful ways by using several senses and communication types. Multimodal strategies in foreign language instruction help create a more holistic and immersive learning environment, which is conducive to better comprehension and retention, as well as the development of creativity, critical thinking, communication, and teamwork, along with other essential 21st-century skills.

---

Key words: multimodal teaching approaches, meaningful language learning, language acquisition, active engagement.

---

REFERENCES

Guo X. Multimodality in language education: implications of a multimodal affective perspective in foreign language teaching. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023. Vol. 14. № 1283625. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/ articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1283625/full.
Kalmatova C. Multimodality in teaching a foreign language to students of philological and pedagogical disciplines. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024. № 5656. P. 2415–2421. URL: https://physics.uz.ua/en/journals/issue-56-2024/ multimodality-in-teaching-a-foreign-language-to-students-of-philological-andpedagogical- disciplines.
Li Y. Exploring Multimodal Translation in English Teaching and Learning. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. № 29. P. 131–135.
Magnusson P., Godhe A.-L. Multimodality in Language Education – Implications for Teaching. Designs for Learning. 2019. № 11 (1). P. 127–137. Oxford University Press. Multimodality and multimodal literacy: What are they and why are they important in ELT?: OUP. Teaching English with Oxford. 16 листопада 2023. URL: https://teachingenglishwithoxford.oup.com/2023/11/16/ multimodality-and-multimodal-literacy-elt/ (22.10.2024).
Paynor R. D. Exploring Multimodal Teaching Strategies and Cultural Integration Leading the Way to Enhance Academic Achievement in English Language Arts. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR). №10 (6). P. 586–590. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra17586.
Sugianto A. Book review: multimodality in English language learning. LLT Journal: a Journal on Language and Language Teaching. 2023. № 26 (1). P. 403–407.
Sutrisno D., Abidin N. A. Z., Pambudi N., Adyawati S. Exploring The Benefits of Multimodal Literacy in English Teaching: Engaging Students Through Visual, Auditory, And Digital Modes. Global Synthesis in Education Journal. 2023. № 2. P. 1–10.

---

Tetiana M. Korolova

Doctor of Philology, Professor at the Philology Department
Odessa National Maritime University,
Odessa, Ukraine
e-mail: kortami863@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3441-196X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.4

---

SUMMARY

The aim of this work is to mark the most significant stages of experimental phonetics development in Ukraine. The researches in phonetics in Ukraine was intended to meet the needs of the society: mastering a foreign language where adequate pronunciation contributes to successful communication. This urgency determined the necessity of theoretical studies of phonetic structure of a foreign language in comparison with the mother tongue, caused the necessity of systematic comparative scientific investigations of phonetic structure of the languages under investigation. At the beginning of the 20th century the phonetic investigations in Ukraine were based on examining the speech sounds articulation using the experimental methods of palatograms, linguagrams and photography; the purpose was to obtain a detailed and exact data of position of the speech organs when producing speech sounds. The first laboratory of experimental phonetics was organised by A. I. Tomson, a professor of Odessa University in 1912. A very important period of linguistic research of sounding speech took place in Ukraine in 1950s–60s. The laboratories of experimental phonetics were organized in Odesa and Kyiv (Shevchenko Kiev National University, at the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Odessa National University). Nowadays global Internet communication is one of primary social needs and thus the quality of oral messages is to meet the requirement. Despite the presence of a certain range of problems, the development of computer technologies in human activities makes a significant contribution to the process of oral speech generating and analysis.

---

Key words: experimental phonetics, methods and techniques, oral communication.

---

REFERENCES

Bagmut A. J., Borysiuk І. V., Olіjnyk G. P. (1980). Іntonacіya yak zasіb movnoyi komunіkacіyi [Intonation as a mean of Lingual Communication]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Brovchenko T. O. (1954). Porivnialʼny analis golosnykh ukrayinsʼkoyi i angliysʼkoyi mov [A Comparative Analysis of Vowels in Ukrainian and English].
Naukovi zapysky І-go MGPIIM [ Scientific Bulletin of the 1-st MGPIIM]. Vol. 8, pp. 2–13 [in Ukrainian].
Brovchenko T. O., Bant I. N. (1964). Fonetyka angliysʼkoyi movy [English Phonetics]. Kyiv: Radʼansʼka shkola [in Ukrainian].
Brovchenko T. O. (1981). Osnovy kontraktyvnogo analizu mov [Basis of the Contractive Analysis of Languages]. Porіvnyalʼnі doslіdzhennʼa z gramatyky anglіysʼkoyi, ukrayinsʼkoyi, rosіysʼkoyi mov [Comparative investigations of English, Ukrainian and Russian languages]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, pp. 17–62 [in Ukrainian].
Brovchenko T. O., Korolova T. M. (2021). English Phonetics. Odessa: Gelvetica.
Korolova T. M. (1989). Intonation of Modality in Sounding Speech. Kiev: Vysshaia shkola.
Nushikian E. A. (1986). Typologia intonacii emociinogo movlennʼa [Typology of emotional speech intonation]. Kyiv; Odessa: Vyshcha shkola [in Ukrainian].
Porivnʼalʼni doslidzhennʼa (1981). Porivnʼalʼni doslidzhennʼa z gramatyky angliysʼkoyi, ukrayinsʼkoyi, rosiysʼkoyi mov [Comparative investigations of English, Ukrainian and Russian languages]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Prokopova L. I. (1958). Zistavnyi analiz prygolosnykh suchasnykh nimeckoyi ta ukrayinsʼkoyi mov [Comparative analysis of consonants in modern German and Ukrainian languages]. Kyiv: KGU [in Ukrainian].
Shubiger M. (1953). The role of Intonation in Spoken English. Cambridge: Heffer University Press.
Sweet H. (1906). A Primer of Phonetics. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
Taranec V. G. (1981). Energetychna teoriya movlennʼa [Energy Theory of Speech]. Kyiv; Odesa: Vyshcha shkola [in Ukrainian].
Zhluktenko Yu. O. (1960). Porіvnialʼna gramatyka ukrayinsʼkoyi ta anglіysʼkoyi mov [A Comparative Grammar of Ukrainian and English]. Kyiv: Radʼansʼka shkola [in Ukrainian].

---

Viktoriia S. Husak

Doctoral Student at the Research Centre of the Baltic Languages and Onomastics
Institute of Lithuanian language,
Vilnius, Lithuania
e-mail: vikanal27@gmail.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.3

---

SUMMARY

The article has been dedicated to the description of the considerable influence of cognitive linguistics on the urbanonyms on the examples of the cities Kyiv and Vilnius. The total amount of the analyzed street names is 60 (40 Ukrainian and 20 Lithuanian). The problem of the research is urgent taking into consideration the street naming and renaming processes as the indicators of the fatal changes in the countries; is it possible to view the street names as imprints of people’s cultural memory; how the collective memory works; how the nation’s experience influences; is phenomenology the backbone of the street naming/renaming processes. This research is an attempt to analyze phenomenology and apply the prototype theory within the scope of the street naming or renaming processes in Kyiv and Vilnius, the countries with the same past and the different ways out the USSR. It is investigated how people’s memory operates and how the national awareness and cognitive processes can change the course of the events. The phenomenology is directly concerned with humans’ cognitive process which in its turn has the particular consequences to the nation and the state building. The research definitely has perspectives for the future. The street names are insufficiently explored and are not debated to the full extent. The main purpose is to observe how the street titles are categorized in mind and what are the reasons of their renaming, involving the mutual historical background as the parts of the USSR. Nevertheless, the phenomenon of such an enormous time gap in European route between Kyiv and Vilnius can be explained with the help of national cognition and its development.

---

Key words: urbanonyms, prototype theory, street naming/renaming processes, phenomenology.

---

REFERENCES

Balode L., Bušs O. (2007). Semantic and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Latvian Urbanonymy in the 20th Century. Onoma. No. 42, pp. 7–38.
Brink S. (2016). Transferred Names and Analogy in Name-formation. The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming [ed. Carole Hough]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 158–166.
Fleischer W. (1962). Zur Frage der Namenfelder. Leipzig: Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift Universitat Leipzig, Gesellsch. Sprachw, pp. 319–326 [in German].
Geeraerts D. (1993). Cognitive linguistics and the history of philosophical epistemology. Conceptualizations and mental processing in language [eds Richard Geiger and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 53–79.
Johnson M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Karpenko Yu. O. (1967). Toponimy Bukovyny: Avtoreferat dysertasii na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia doct. filol. nauk [Toponyms of the region Bukovyna]. Kyiv: Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Lakoff G., Johnson M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chikago: University of Chikago Press.
Lakoff G. (2006). Conceptual Metaphor: The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics Research. 34 [ed. Dirk Geeraerts]. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 185–238.
Murphy G. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Mass, Cambridge: The MIT press A Bradford book.
Neklesova V. Yu. (2010). Kognityvna pryroda vlasnykh nazv na poznachennia chasu: Dys. … kand. filol. nauk. Odesa: ONU imeni I. I. Mechnykova.
Peeters B. (2001). Does cognitive linguistics live up to its name? Language and Ideology [eds René Dirven, Bruce Hawkins, Esra Sandikcioglu]. Vol. 1: Theoretical Cognitive Approaches. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 83–106.
Reszegi K. (2018). Mental aspects of proper names. Onomastica Uralica. No. 10, pp. 149–167.
Rosch E. (1988). Principles of Categorization. Readings in Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 312–322.
Tarpley F. (1996). Street Names as Signpost of Word Cultures. Name Studies: an International Handbook of Onomastics (Handbuch zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. 11.2.) [Steger H., H. E. Wiegand (Hrsg.)]. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1481–1499.
The law on decommunization (2015). Law of Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://pkrv.dp.gov.ua/news/zgidno-zakonu-pro-dekomunizaciyu-174/Retrieved November 7, 2023.
The list of streets in the city of Vilnius that were renamed (2023). Distributed by New Media Group. URL: http://surl.li/qywtr/Retrieved December 15, 2023.
Van Langendonck W. (2007). Theory and Typology of Proper Names (Studies and Monographs). Berlin; New York: Mou-ton de Gruyter.
Vietovardžių žodynu (2007). Distributed by Lithuanian Language Institute. Retrieved from: http://vietovardziai.lki.lt/Retrieved February 3, 2024.
Wen X., Yang K., Kuang F. (2014). Cognitive Linguistics: Retrospect and prospect. School of Foreign Languages, Southwest University. No. 2. China: Tiansheng Road, Beibei, Chongqing, pp. 56–68.

---

Volodymyr A. Glushchenko

Doctor of Science (Linguistics), Professor at the Department
of Germanic and Slavonic Linguistics
State Higher Educational Institution «Donbas State Pedagogical University»,
Sloviansk, Ukraine
e-mail: sdpunauka@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2394-4966

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.2

---

SUMMARY

The principle of historicism is a leading ontological component of the comparative-historical method. It played a key role in the emergence and development of this method. Similarities between languages had long been noticed by scholars, but they were primarily interpreted from a static perspective using the apparatus of universal grammar. The idea of a genetic relationship between certain languages had also been expressed, but for centuries it did not become dominant. A certain impetus that marked the starting point for the emergence of the comparative-historical method was the discovery of Sanskrit by Europeans. G.-L. Cooeurdoux, W. Jones, and other 18th-century researchers emphasized that Sanskrit, Ancient Greek, Latin, and the Germanic, Celtic, and Iranian languages belong to a single linguistic family and originate from a common source. Comparative linguistics in the first quarter of the 19th century represented a significant advancement compared to earlier linguisticgenetic constructions. For 17th- and 18th-century linguists, linguistic material was illustrative in nature, and facts were interpreted arbitrarily. Additionally, lexical units, which are the least stable, were at the forefront. Comparative linguistics, however, bases historical comparison of languages on their grammatical and phonetic structures, and in lexicon, appeals to archaic (primary) layers. Early comparativists identified identical functional morphemes in related (Indo-European) languages (F. Bopp), formulated the principle of regular phonetic correspondences in cognate words and forms of these languages, and on this basis reconstructed historical phonetic laws (R. Rask, J. Grimm, A. Chr. Vostokov). They also reconstructed the common lexical stock of Indo-European languages (R. Rask, J. Grimm). All language changes were interpreted as regular. This created a favorable basis for the refinement of the comparativehistorical method in comparative linguistics in the 1870s–1930s.

---

Key words: comparative-historical method, comparative linguistics, principle of historicism, regularity of language changes.

---

REFERENCES

Bopp F. (1833). Vergleichende Grammatik des Sanskrit, Zend, Armenischen, Griechischen, Lateinischen, Litauischen, Altslavischen, Gothischen und Deutschen.
Berlin. Bd 1. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_gVUTAAAAQAAJ/page/n3/mode/2up (дата звернення: 08.11.2024).
Glushchenko V. A. (2010). Linhvistychnyi metod i yoho struktura [The Linguistic Method and its Structure]. Movoznavstvo [ Linguistics]. № 6, рр. 32–44 [in Ukrainian].
Glushchenko V. A. (2017). Porivnialno-istorychnyi metod v ukrainskomu ta rosiiskomu movoznavstvi ХІХ st. – 30-kh rr. ХХ st. [The comparative-historical Method in Ukrainian and Russian Linguistics of the 19th Century – 30s of the 20th Century]: monohrafiia. Sloviansk: Vyd-vo B. I. Matorina [in Ukrainian].
Glushchenko V., Lykhаchоva A., Rybаlchеnko O. (2021). U vytokiv henealohichnoi klasyfikatsii mov: istoryzm i movna sporidnenist [At the Origins of Genealogical Classification of Languages: Historicism and Linguistic Relatedness].
Actual space of philology: [сollective] monograph. Opole: The Academy of Management and Administration in Opole. Рр. 9–17 [in Ukrainian].
Grimm J. (1826). Deutsche Grammatik. Göttingen. Th. II. ХІ. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=cpG7sNeDPI4C&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false (дата звернення: 11.11.2024).
Kate L. ten. (1723). Aenleiding tot de kennise van het verhevene deel der nederduitsche spraake. Amsterdam. Retrieved from: https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/kate002aenl01_01/kate002aenl01_01_0004.php (дата звернення: 10.11.2024).
Klіmov G. A. (1971). Questions on the Methodology of Comparative-Genetic Research.
Kocherhan M. P. (2006). Osnovy zistavnoho movoznavstva [Fundamentals of Comparative Linguistics]. Kyiv: Akademiia.
Kolosov M. (1878). A Review of the Phonetic and Formal Features of the Folk Russian Language.
Коvаlyk І. I., Sаmiylеnkо S. P. (1985). Zahalne movoznavstvo: istoriia linhvistychnoi dumky [General Linguistics: History of Linguistic Thought]. Kyiv: Higher School.
Rask R. K. (1818). Undersögelse om det gamle Nordiske eller islandske Sprogs Oprindelse. Kjöbenhavn. Х. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/undersgelseomde00raskgoog (дата звернення: 04.11.2024).
Scaligeri J. J. (1610). Opuscula varia antehac non edita. Paris : Privilegio Regis. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=J_fZC_-UtA0C&pg=PP5&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=1#v=onepage&q&f=false (дата звернення: 14.11.2024).
Shor R. O., Chemodanov N. S. (1945). Introduction to Linguistics.
Thomsen V. (1927). Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bis zum Ausgang des 19. Jahrhunderts. Halle: Max Niemeyer. Retrieved from: 0965432 https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-history-of-linguistics/references/5B13A59D2905217F340183B4B7FFFC82 (дата звернення: 12.11.2024).
Vostokov A. (1865). Discourse about the Slavic Language. Philological Observations. Рр. 1–27.

---

Alexander I. Iliadi

Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor at the Chair of Translation,
Theoretical and Applied Linguistics
State Institution «South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University
named after K. D. Ushynsky»,
Odessa, Ukraine
e-mail: alexandr.iliadi@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5078-8316

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.1

---

SUMMARY

The paper deals with the results of etymological analysis of a group of lexemes in the vocabulary of Eastern and Western (Polish) Slavonic languages. The aims of this study: а) to give the etymological explanation of several Slavonic lexemes, which hitherto have not been the object of linguistic analysis or examined as «not entirely clear» in the special literature; b) to clarify the etymological relations and the structure of the words which have already got a preliminary assessment in the investigations of the paper author predecessors. The treatment of these words enables not only to clarify their genetic relations to the cognates and determine the details of their structure, but also substantiate their Proto-Slavonic age, having supposed the areal limitation of corresponding Proto-Slavonic prototypes. It is about the following words: *balǫgъ or *bololǫgъ (along with Lith. Láng-a-balė, where inversion of the components is presented), *xomila, *obxobьje, *termъkъ or *tьrmъkъ, *tyr(ʼ)a, *vorma (the dialectal morphological innovation to the original *verma), *vьrgo-lykъ. Proto-Slav. *xomila, *termъkъ, *tyr(ʼ)a, evidently, belonged to the terminological (hunting, fishing and agricultural) vocabulary.

---

Key words: etymology, comparative-historical method, prototype, derivative, Slavonic languages.

---

REFERENCES

Arkušyn G. L. (2000). Slovnyk zakhidnopolisʼkykh govirok [Dictionary of Western Polesye Dialects]. Т. 2: О–Я. Lutsk: Vezha.
Bailey H. (1960). Arya II. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 13–39.
Duičak M. (1995). Slovnyk mikrotoponimiv ukrayinsʼkykh sil Skhidnoyi Slovaččyny [Dictionary of Mycrotoponyms of Ukrainian Villages of Eastern Slovakia]. Naukovyi zbirnyk Derzhavnogo muzeyu ukrayinsʼko-rusʼkoyi kulʼtury u Svydnyku [ Scientific Collection of State Museum of Ukrainian-Russian Culture in Svidnik]. Prʼashiv. Kn. 20, pp. 321–447.
Fraenkel E. (1965). Litauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch 2, Heidelberg, Göttingen: Carl Winter and Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Iliadi A. I. (2019). Miscellanea etymologica: Slavica. Paradigm of knowledge. № 4 (36), pp. 81–102.
Kurylo O. (1928). Materialy do ukrayinsʼkoyi dialektologiyi ta folʼklorystytky [Materials for Ukrainian Dialectology and Folkloristics]. Kyiv: VAN.
Martynaw V. U. (ed.) (1980). Ètymalagičny slownik belaruskay movy [Etymological Dictionary of Belarusian Languages]. Minsk: Navuka i tèkhnika. Т. 2.
Matviyas I. (1998). Varianty ukrayinsʼkoyi literaturnoyi movy [Variants of Ukrainian Literary Language]. Kyiv: Instytut ukrayinsʼkoyi movy NANU.
Melʼnyčuk O. S. (ed.). (1982–2012). Etymologičnyi slovnyk ukrayinsʼkoyi movy [An Etymological Dictionary of Ukrainian Language]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. T. 1–6.
Onomastic Archive of IUL NASU.
Sławski F. (1974). Zarys słowotwórstwa prasłowiańskiego. Słownik prasłowiański 1: A–B / [pod red. Franciszka Sławskiego]. Wrocław; Warszawa etc. : Wydawnictwo Polskiej akademii nauk. S. 43–141.
Smoczyński W. (2019). Słownik etymologiczny języka litewskiego [współpraca redakcyjna M. Osłon, wydanie drugie, poprawione i znacznie rozszerzone, na prawach rękopisu]. 2019. Available at: www.rromanes.org/pub/alii/Smoczyński W. Słownik etymologiczny języka litewskiego.pdf.
Szulowska W., Wolnicz-Pawłowska E. (2001). Nazwy wód w Polsce. Warszawa: PAN DIT. Cz. I: Układ alfabetyczny.
Šulʼgač V. P. (1998). Zametki po donskoi gidronimii: Варгол [Notes on the Don Hydronymy]. Vostočnoukrainskiy lingvističeskiy sbornik [Eastern Ukrainian Linguistic Collection]. Donetsk: Doneččina. Vol. 4, pp. 182–187.
Vanagas A. (1981). Lietuvių hidronimų etimologinis žodynas. Vilnius: Mokslas.

 

---

Miscellanea etymologica: Slavica. IV

Alexander I. Iliadi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.1

---

The principle of historicism and the origins of the comparative-historical method

Volodymyr A. Glushchenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.2

---

The significant impact of cognitive linguistics on the urbanonyms as imprints of cultural memory (on the example of the cities kyiv and vilnius)

Viktoriia S. Husak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.3

---

Experimental phonetics in ukraine: main stages

Tetiana M. Korolova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.4

---

Practical application of multimodal approaches in foreign language teaching

Tetiana Yu. Moroz, Svitlana S. Mykytiuk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-39.5

---

Oleksandra O. Kosiuha

Post-graduate student at the Department of English Philology and World Literature, Kherson State University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
e-mail: akosyuga@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5633-4665

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2616-5317-2024-38.10

---

SUMMARY

Scientific research is devoted to a critical review of the reproduction of the categories of space and time in the film version of J.K. Rowling's novel "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire". The comparative analysis of verbal and non-verbal means of creating categories of time and space in the film narrative was carried out by creating a sample of data from film scripts (in English and Ukrainian languages) from a selected episode of the film. The paper examines the issue of regularities in the use of words and phrases, as well as gestures, facial expressions, noises, sounds, and musical accompaniment to depict time and space in a film narrative based on films of the fantasy genre (on the example of an adventure fantasy film about Harry Potter). The main cases of using verbal and non-verbal means are characterized (special attention is paid to chronemics and proxemics). The research material was: the film adaptation of the fourth book of adventures about the little wizard by J.K. Rowling "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" in the original language (director - M. Newell, 2005) and the Ukrainian dubbing of this film by the studio "Так Треба Продакшн" to order vod-platform sweet.tv in 2020. As a result of the research, it was established that, firstly, the film narrative has its own specific features that distinguish it from the classical narrative; secondly, that both verbal and non-verbal means of creating categories of space and time have a huge impact on the construction of the entire film in general.

---

Key words: narrative, film narrative, verbal means, non-verbal means, discourse, chronemics and proxemics.

---

REFERENCES

Kosiuha O. (2023). Zhanrovi osoblyvosti septolohii pro Harri Pottera: vid kazky do hotychnoi literatury [Genre Features of Septology about Harry Potter: from Fairy Tale to Gothic Literature]. Naukovy visnyk KhDU. Seriia «Hermanistyka ta mizhkulturna komunikatsiia» [ Scientific Bulletin of KhSU. «German studies and intercultural communication series»], 1, pp. 22–18.
Rikman A. (2023). Shaleno, hlyboko. Shchodennyky [Crazily, deeply. Diaries]. Kyiv : Nash format.
Rowling J. K. (2003). Harri Potter i kelykh vohniu [Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire]. Kyiv: A-BA-BA-HA-LA-MA-HA.
Tsapiv A. O. (2019). Suchasni kazkovi kinonaratyvy pid mikroskopom naratoloha: krytychnyi ohliad ta dyskusii [Modern Fairy-Tale Film Narratives under
the Microscope of a Narratologist: Critical Review and Discussions]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia «Hermanistyka ta mizhkulturna komunikatsiia» [Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series «German Studies and Intercultural Communication»], №2, pp. 89–95.
Chatman S. (1980). Story and discourse. Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca ; London : Cornell University Press.
Eco U. (1979). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington : Indiana University Press, 1979.
Ewata T. (2016). Meaning and nonverbal communication if films. Issues in language & linguistic: Perspectives from Nigeria. Vol. 3. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304180005_Meaning_and_nonverbal_communication_in_films.
Felton T. (2022). Beyond the wand. The magic and mayhem of growing up a wizard. London : Ebury Spotlight.
Foenkinos D. (2022). Numéro deux. Paris : GALLIMARD.
Johnson M. K. (2009). Doubling, Transfiguration and Haunting: the Art of adapting Harry Potter for film. Reading Harry Potter Again: New critical Essays /[Ed. by Giselle Lisa Anatol]. Praeger, pp. 207–221.
Metz Ch. (1991). Film language: A semiotics of the cinema. Chicago : The University Press of Chicago.
Rieupeyrout J. L. (1977). Histoire du Far-West. Paris : Tchou.
Rowling J. K. (2000). Harry Potter and the Goblet of fire. London : Bloomsbury.
Stratton C. (2017). Nonverbal communication and the influence of film success: A literature review. Concordia journal of communication research. Vol. 4. Article 1. URL: https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/comjournal/vol4/iss1/1