{"id":979,"date":"2019-10-13T08:16:05","date_gmt":"2019-10-13T08:16:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/?p=979"},"modified":"2019-10-13T08:59:36","modified_gmt":"2019-10-13T08:59:36","slug":"%d0%b4%d0%be-%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%be%d0%b1%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8-%d0%b2%d1%96%d0%b4%d1%82%d0%b2%d0%be%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%bd%d1%8f-%d1%84%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%b7%d0%b5%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%be%d0%b3%d1%96%d1%87","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/2019\/10\/13\/%d0%b4%d0%be-%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%be%d0%b1%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8-%d0%b2%d1%96%d0%b4%d1%82%d0%b2%d0%be%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%bd%d1%8f-%d1%84%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%b7%d0%b5%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%be%d0%b3%d1%96%d1%87\/","title":{"rendered":"On the Issue of Rendering Phraseological Units"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u0413\u043b\u0443\u0449\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0412. \u0410., <\/strong>\u0414\u0435\u0440\u0456\u043a \u0406. \u041c., <\/strong>\u0413\u043e\u0440\u0431\u0430\u0447\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u041a. \u0412.\"pdf\"<\/a>
\n<\/strong>DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24195\/2616-5317-2018-26-4<\/p>\n

\n

Key words:<\/strong> folklore discourse, phraseological units, mythological units, allusions,\u2019chen yu\u2019, translation tactics and operations.<\/p>\n

\n

The article deals with the problem of rendering different types of phraseological units in folklore discourse translation from the Chinese, English and Ukrainian languages. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of translating mythological units, allusions and Chinese utterances \u2019chen yu\u2019. The translation tactics and operations employed to render the semantics and pragmatics of the source discourse by means of typologically distant languages have also been analyzed.<\/p>\n

\n

REFERENCES<\/p>\n

Bol\u2019shoj kitajsko-russkij slovar\u2019 \/ N. Kostenko.\u00a0\u2014 M., 1987.\u00a0\u2014 670 s. [in Russian].<\/p>\n

Van Dechun\u2019\u00a0. Sin guan\u2019jun\u2019juj cidjan\u2019 (Slovnik novih vislov\u0456v).\u00a0\u2013Shanhaj,\u00a01996.\u00a0\u2014 245\u00a0s. [in Russian].<\/p>\n

Vinogradov\u00a0V.\u00a0V. Ob osnovnyh tipah frazeologicheskih edinic v russkom jazyke. Izdatel\u2019stvo: Nauka, 1986.\u00a0\u2014 547 s. [in Russian].<\/p>\n

Kytaiskyi slovnyk \u8f9e\u6d77.\u00a0\u2014 \u5317\u4eac, 1999.\u00a0\u2014 1370 s. [in Ukrainian].<\/p>\n

Korolova\u00a0T.\u00a0M., Popova\u00a0O.\u00a0V., Din Sin. \u201cOsnovy dvostoronnoho perekladu: kytaiska, ukrainska, rosiiska movy\u201d \u2013 Odesa: Vydavnytstvo Pivdennoukrainskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu kafedry perekladu i teoretychnoi ta prykladnoi linhvistyky, 2013.\u00a0\u2014 153 s. [in Ukrainian].<\/p>\n

Litvinov\u00a0P.\u00a0P. Frazeologija, Izdatel\u2019stvo: Primstroj, 2001 \u2013 245 s. [in Russian].<\/p>\n

Riftin\u00a0B.\u00a0L. Geroi i sjuzheti kitajskih skazok.: Hud. lit., 1972.\u00a0\u2014 392 s. [in Russian].<\/p>\n

Riftin\u00a0B.\u00a0P. Kitajskie narodnye skazki.\u00a0\u2014 M.: Hud. lit., 1972.\u00a0\u2014 320 c. [in Russian].<\/p>\n

Tolkovyj slovar\u2019 russkogo jazyka: v 4 t.\u00a0\/ Pod red. D.\u00a0N.\u00a0Ushakova. M., 2000.\u00a0\u2013 873 s. [in Russian].<\/p>\n

Shhichko\u00a0V.\u00a0F. Teorija, praktika perevoda.\u00a0\u2014 M.: Vostok-Zapad, 2004.\u00a0\u2014 223 s. [in Russian].<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u0413\u043b\u0443\u0449\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0412. \u0410., \u0414\u0435\u0440\u0456\u043a \u0406. \u041c., \u0413\u043e\u0440\u0431\u0430\u0447\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u041a. \u0412. DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24195\/2616-5317-2018-26-4 Key words: folklore discourse, phraseological units, mythological units, allusions,\u2019chen yu\u2019, translation tactics and operations. The article deals with the problem of rendering different types of phraseological units in folklore discourse translation from the Chinese, English and Ukrainian languages. Special attention is paid to the ...continue reading \"On the Issue of Rendering Phraseological Units\"<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[56],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-979","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-issue-26","h-entry","hentry","h-as-article"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/979","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=979"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/979\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1075,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/979\/revisions\/1075"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}