{"id":563,"date":"2019-10-05T14:37:17","date_gmt":"2019-10-05T14:37:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/?p=563"},"modified":"2019-10-07T15:16:48","modified_gmt":"2019-10-07T15:16:48","slug":"28_3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/2019\/10\/05\/28_3\/","title":{"rendered":"ON THE ISSUE OF THE METHODOLOGY OF O. O. POTEBNIA\u2019S RESEARCHES"},"content":{"rendered":"

Volodymyr Glushchenko \"pdf\"<\/a><\/strong>
\nState Institution \u201cDonbass State Pedagogical University\u201d
\nE-mail: sdpunauka@ukr.net
\nORCID ID https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20130001\u20135545\u20137452
\nDOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24195\/2616-5317-2019-28-3<\/p>\n

\n

Keywords: historic and phonetic works, genetic ties between languages, phonetic law, analogy.<\/p>\n

\n

The main goal of the presented article is the analysis of M. M. Sokolov\u2019s methodological conclusions about O. O. Potebnia\u2019s scientific legacy from the point of view of their objectivity and faithfulness, particularly, to what extent the true achievements and drawbacks of O. O. Potebnia\u2019s historic and phonetic works have been rendered. The tasks of the research included the following: to explain the meaning of M. M. Sokolov\u2019s statements concerning the interpretation of O. O. Potebnia\u2019s views on the genetic ties between languages, the phonetic laws and analogy. There has been also made an attempt to assess M. M. Sokolov\u2019s definitions from the point of view of modern methodology, linguistic historiography and comparative linguistics. In our opinion, the suggested by M. M. Sokolov critical review of O. O. Potebnia\u2019s views on the genetic ties between the languages, the phonetic laws and analogy is one-sided and simplified. The findings of the research have proved that the interconnection between the East-Slavic and Old Slavonic languages was described in O. O. Potebnia\u2019s works from the point of view of the comparative historic method. O. O. Potebnia studied the interconnected phonetic laws which in his interpretation were postulated as exact, true not only for separate sounds but also their features (the conception of the \u201cqualitative consonant shifts\u201d). The critical review of M. M. Sokolov \u2019s judgments was predetermined by the fact that the scholar treated O. O. Potebnia\u2019s historic and phonetic legacy not from the point of view of historical linguistics but according to \u201cthe assimilation of the past\u201d. The theses postulated by M. M. Sokolov didn\u2019t reflect the views of other representatives of Moscow linguistic school. The perspective of the further research is seen in the more detailed study of O. O. Potebnia\u2019s scientific legacy as well as views of other representatives of Kharkiv linguistic school in the context of the linguistics of XIX cent. \u2014 early XX\u0406 cent.<\/p>\n

\n

REFERENCES<\/p>\n

1. Belorussov I. M. Sintaksis russkogo yazyka v issledovaniyah A. A. Potebni. Orel, 1902. 258, HII s.
\n2. Berezin F. M. Russkoe yazykoznanie konca XIX \u2014 nachala XX v. \/ otv. red. F. P. Filin. M. : Nauka, 1976. 366 c.
\n3. Bulahovskij L. A. Potebnya-lingvist. Uch. zap. Mosk. un-ta. 1946. Vyp. 107. T. 3. Kn. 2. S. 36\u201362.
\n4. Glushchenko V. A. Metodolog\u0456ya dosl\u0456dzhen\u2019 O. O. Potebn\u0456 v \u0456nterpretac\u0456\u0457 M. M. Sokolova. Naukov\u0456 prac\u0456 : naukovo-metodichnij zhurnal. T. 221. Vip. 209. F\u0456lolog\u0456ya. Movoznavstvo. Mikola\u0457v : Vid-vo CHDU \u0456m. Petra Mogili, 2014. S. 16\u201319.
\n5. Glushchenko V. A. Principi por\u0456vnyal\u2019no-\u0456storichnogo dosl\u0456dzhennya v ukra\u0457ns\u2019komu \u0456 ros\u0456js\u2019komu movoznavstv\u0456 (70-\u0456 rr. H\u0456H st. \u2014 20-\u0456 rr. HKH st.) \/ NAN Ukra\u0457ni, \u0456n-t movoznavstva \u0456m. O. O. Potebn\u0456 ; v\u0456dp. red. O. B. Tkachenko. Donec\u2019k, 1998. 222 s.
\n6. Glushchenko V. A. Sistematizac\u0456ya \u0456storiko-fonetichnogo mater\u0456alu v stud\u0456yah O. O. Potebn\u0456. O. O. Potebnya j aktual\u2019n\u0456 pitannya movi ta kul\u2019turi : zb. nauk. prac\u2019 \/ v\u0456dp. red. V. YU. Franchuk. K. : Vidavnichij d\u0456m Dmitra Burago, 2004. S. 173\u2013180.
\n7. ZHiteckij P. I. Ocherk zvukovoj istorii malorusskogo narechiya. K., 1876. IV, 376 s.
\n8. Kolesov V. V. Sravnitel\u2019no-istoricheskij metod v trudah A. A. Potebni. Naukova spadshchina O. O. Potebn\u0456 \u0456 suchasna f\u0456lolog\u0456ya. Do 150-r\u0456chchya z dnya narodzhennya O. O. Potebn\u0456 : zb. nauk. prac\u2019 \/ v\u0456dp. red. V. YU. Franchuk. K. : Nauk. dumka, 1985. S. 25\u201339.
\n9. Kolosov M. A. Obzor zvukovyh i formal\u2019nyh osobennostej narodnogo russkogo yazyka \/ M. A. Kolosov. Varshava, 1878. X, 270 s.
\n10. Kolosov M. A. Ocherk istorii zvukov i form russkogo yazyka s XI po HVI stoletie \/ M. A. Kolosov. Varshava, 1872. 192 s.
\n11. Potebnya A. A. Dva issledovaniya o zvukah russkogo yazyka: \u0456. O polnoglasii, \u0456\u0456. O zvukovyh osobennostyah russkih narechij. \u2014 Voronezh, 1866. \u2014 156, \u0456\u0456\u0456 s.
\n12. Potebnya A. A. K istorii zvukov russkogo yazyka : etimologicheskie i drugie zametki. Varshava, 1880. CH. 2. II, 31, 70, 25 s.
\n13. Sokolov N. N. [Rec. :] Sintaksis russkogo yazyka v issledovaniyah Potebni : izlozhil I. Belorussov. Orel, 1902. Izv. Otd-niya rus. yaz. i slovesnosti. 1903. T. 8. Kn. 2. S. 347\u2013366.
\n14. Fasmer M. Etimologicheskij slovar\u2019 russkogo yazyka : v 4-h t. Izd. 2-e. M. : Progress, 1986. T. 2. 672 s.
\n15. Fortunatov F. F. Russkij filologicheskij vestnik. 1879 g. \u2116 1-j ([Rec. :] Potebnya A. A. Etimologicheskie zametki. Nachal\u2019nye sochetaniya ly-, ry-, lu-, ru- = osnovnym *al, *ar). Kriticheskoe obozrenie. 1879. \u2116 7. S. 33\u201335.
\n16. Franchuk V. YU. O. O. SHahmatov \u0456 naukova spadshchina O. O. Potebn\u0456. Movoznavstvo. 1974. \u2116 3. S. 36\u201344.
\n17. Franchuk V. YU. Oleksandr Opanasovich Potebnya. K. : Nauk. dumka, 1975. 92 s.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Volodymyr Glushchenko State Institution \u201cDonbass State Pedagogical University\u201d E-mail: sdpunauka@ukr.net ORCID ID https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20130001\u20135545\u20137452 DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24195\/2616-5317-2019-28-3 Keywords: historic and phonetic works, genetic ties between languages, phonetic law, analogy. The main goal of the presented article is the analysis of M. M. Sokolov\u2019s methodological conclusions about O. O. Potebnia\u2019s scientific legacy from the point of view of ...continue reading \"ON THE ISSUE OF THE METHODOLOGY OF O. O. POTEBNIA\u2019S RESEARCHES\"<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[64],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-563","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-64","h-entry","hentry","h-as-article"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/563","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=563"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/563\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":702,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/563\/revisions\/702"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}