\n
![\"pdf\"](\"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/833px-PDF_file_icon.svg_-e1568127429360.png\"){kind=icon}
<\/a><\/span><\/p>\nDoctor of Philology, professor, chief researcherat the Institute of Linguistics of National academy of sciences of Ukraine.
\nKiev, Ukraine.
\ne-mail: vmbritsyn@ukr.net
\nORCID ID:https: \/\/ orcid. org \/ 0000 \u2013 0002 \u2013 3243 \u2013 7958<\/p>\n
DOI:\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24195\/2616-5317-2021-32-2<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Key words:<\/strong> cognitive theory of modality, analysis of poetic text.<\/span><\/p>\n The article outlines the main provisions of the cognitive theory of modality and shows the possibilities of applying this theory in the process of describing poetic texts. The methodology of applying the cognitive theory of modality is demonstrated mainly on the material of the poetic works by T. Shevchenko. They exhibit an extremely wide palette of modal meanings and modal thought transitions. In particular, the visual perceptions presented here are an example of the verbal continuation of the talent of the wonderful artist. The article shows the innovation of T. Shevchenko in the modal organization of poetic texts, the correlation between his finds and new stylistic devices that were introduced by A. Pushkin who greatly enriched the literature.<\/p>\n REFERENCES<\/p>\n Britsyn V. M. Kohnityvni aspekty teoriyi modal?nosti [Cognitive aspects of modality theory] \/\/ Movoznavstvo. 2013. \u2116 2 \u2013 3. S. 128 \u2013 148 [in Ukrainian]. Victor Britsyn Doctor of Philology, professor, chief researcherat the Institute of Linguistics of National academy of sciences of Ukraine. Kiev, Ukraine. e-mail: vmbritsyn@ukr.net ORCID ID:https: \/\/ orcid. org \/ 0000 \u2013 0002 \u2013 3243 \u2013 7958 DOI:\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24195\/2616-5317-2021-32-2 Key words: cognitive theory of modality, analysis of poetic text. The article outlines the main provisions of ...continue reading \"MODAL ASPECTS OF INTERPRETATION OF POETIC TEXT\"<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[73],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-issue-32","h-entry","hentry","h-as-article"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2540"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2540\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2652,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2540\/revisions\/2652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lingstud.od.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n
\n
\n
\nBritsyn V. M. Modal\u2019na hramatyka yak novyy napryamok semantyko-syntaksychnoho vyvchennya movy [Modal grammar as a new direction of semantic-syntactic study of language] \/\/ Movoznavstvo. 2006. \u2116 3. S. 101 \u2013 110 [in Ukrainian].
\nBritsyn V. M. Modal\u2019nist\u2019 i predykatyvnist\u2019: liniyi rozmezhuvannya y protystavlennya [Modality and predicativeness: lines of demarcation and opposition] \/\/ Movoznavstvo. 2015. ? 2. S. 77 \u2013 85 [in Ukrainian].
\nVinogradov V.V. O kategorii modal\u2019nosti i modal\u2019nykh slovakh v russkom yazyke [About the category of modality and modal words in Russian] \/\/ Issledovaniya po russkoy grammatike: izbrannyye trudy. Moskva, 1975. S. 53 \u2013 87 [in Russian].
\nLotman YU. M. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta: struktura stikha [Analysis of the poetic text: the structure of the verse]. Moskva: Prosveshcheniye, 1972. 271 s. [in Russian].
\nMel?nychuk O. S. Rozvytok struktury slov\u2019yans\u2019koho rechennya [Development of the structure of the Slavic sentence]. Kyiv: Nauk. dumka, 1966. 324 s. [in Ukrainian].
\nRevzina O. G. Metody analiza khudozhestvennogo teksta [Methods for analyzing literary text] \/\/ Struktura i semantika khudozhestvennogo teksta. Moskva, 1998. S. 301 \u2013 316 [in Russian].
\nTodorov Tsv. Poetika [Poetics] \/\/ Strukturalizm: \u00abza\u00bb i \u00abprotiv\u00bb. Moskva, 1975. S. 37 \u2013 113 [in Russian].
\nKhrakovskiy V.S., Volodin A.P. Semantika i tipologiya imperativa. Russkiy imperative
\n[Semantics and typology of the imperative. Russian imperative]. Len\u043dngrad: URSS, 1986. 270 s. [in Russian].<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"